have you read the reviews that are counted on in Metacritic?
There are journalist with integrity, who treats games with respect and considers their quality with long history of gaming in hindsight.
Then there are journalists who treats game reviewing as a task which just needs to be over with, and has no regard over the quality of the game in respect of its predecessors and influences, as well as gauging expectations of the target crowd to the finished product.
Any review which does not mark down a PC game for the lack of manual saves and lack of dedicated servers (where multiplayer is an integral part) cannot read without a large bucket of skepticism over the professionalism of the reviewer himself.
Not to mention lack of advanced graphical options (for a "grand game") and modability ( with regards to its direct competitor).
Bad review sites which no regard of true professionalism are all over the web. Gamespot had became one amongst them. ( at least in the PC subdivision)
Log in to comment