Halo Reach and Halo 3's graphics as far as overall quality is so small its sad. Sure, they changed the models on the guns but in 3 years you'd expect that the graphics would get better.
In case I wasn't already positiive on this decision, this article has confirmed by big NO on buying 3 480 GTXs. By the way yes, computers are more expensive then your plastic XboX, but it does a lot more. Also, I was playing Modern Warfare 2 on my friends' XboX and literally laughed at the graphics. You console junkies say that graphics don't make a game, and you're right but it makes it a hell of a lot better of an experiance. And before you even try to counter that argument then ask youself this: Why aren't all games just made for an NES?
The human mind and it's inability to process thier actions will always amaze me. I play a lot of video games but I dont see how someone could play Starcraft for 30 hours. It's a great game, but I'd get bored after like 3 or 4 hours... well maybe bored after 6 or 7.
Uhh... unless I looked directly at the pants I wouldn't of noticed... at all. Either way I think the PS3 is a better package for it's price since it has free internet and a built-in blu-ray player. Other then that everything is the same... and don't say XBL is better, it's really not that different. Well only one way to settle this, take a screen of a computer running this on high settings. That'll make console fanboys stop talking.
Ugh, are you surprised? with XboX Sony and PC players here? Xbox has kids, Sony has (I forgot), and PCers like myself are called noobs for not bieng able to use controllers? I am ashamed at us for doing this to boards such as this. The only evidence I have of any of this is when an Xboxer was yelling out random army commands. But even so, one section of the xbox army shouldn't repersent them all. We should unite! Power to the players!
Reiken37's comments