First and foremost, the PS3 was never touted to 'eventually' take over. From the very beginning it was dubbed as the winner of this gen. Sony, as well as the fanboys, crowned it King. The reality is that it is dead last, and will continue to be dead last. And, since it's launch, everyone has been spewing 'wait til,...' over and over again as well as coming up with some strange excuses as to why it isn't King; "The 360 is preventing the PS3 from creating wonder graphics, the developers botched the port, everyone needs to get a better paying job, reviewers are all purposely biased towards the PS3". It's all out there and pretty sad.
Demetri_OS
This is true unfortunately. Sony was way too confident going into this generation. But with the sales of the PS2, who can blame them?
Lips Number One Hits - (not enough reviews to qualify at the moment)
Give me the PS3's exclusive lineup in a heartbeat. The 360 lineup looks rather dull , does it not ?
Ninja-Hippo
Why even compare exclusive lineups though? What's the purpose? If you were in a game store there'd be dozens more quality games to buy, you wouldn't say 'well those dont count because they aren't exclusive'. Makes no sense. Funny, I was just arguing this same point in another thread.
Log in to comment