This is one of those completely pointless articles, just giving fan boys fuel to have heated discussions with no one being right. Obviously a high end PC is better any day that anything else. It will always have the graphic capacity to be better than all consoles (Crysis) and the mouse and keyboard are the best controls for many a game. But lets not forget that a high end PC that can run everything at such crisp levels is anywhere between 1500-2000 dollars is not more, so all you are doing is just rubbing in that you have such PCs to make the comparison... Graphics are pretty, we got that, but a game can look great but play like complete pile of garbage. I would waste less time on these pointless comparisons between systems, but rather look on exclusive content, control differences, gameplay.... the first two Fallouts, StarCraft, KOTOR, Mass Effect, Shadow of the Colossus, System Shock, those games can't even compare graphically to most what you present here, but in all honesty they are still better than 80% of all of the modern garbage where everyone recycles games every year and does the copy and paste crap trying to pull it off by re-releasing same titles with different names (or what I call the EA strategy)

Live and 2k look almost neck in neck. Live is slighly more detailed and less edgy, but 2k is stepping up their game in this department. I am not sure why 09 is even there, its like the dumb cousing of NBA games, you don't want to bring it along but your family makes you do it...