Patterson Elementary

Cooper Middle School

South Cobb High School

Say What you wan't about them what do you think of them.

probably pikachu, man that little yellow rat was coolTigerFangRed

:oops:LOL:oops:

Sakura Mitsukoshi - http://screenmania.retrogames.com/arcade/05/arcade_0150_03.png

http://screenmania.retrogames.com/arcade/05/arcade_0150_20.png

http://screenmania.retrogames.com/arcade/05/arcade_0150_27.png

[QUOTE="Shinitsukoshi"]

[QUOTE="Puiumami"][QUOTE="Teuvan"][QUOTE="Puiumami"][QUOTE="Teuvan"]Gamespot no love loli? :(
[IMG]Your telling me, that in Lolicon, those two kids in that picture will partake in sexual activities from a grown man? , all the while it is animated. GODAMN this. I take from your post that you support Lolicon, no? because it appears you do or are being sarcastically moronic. Just thinking what would happen to them makes my stomach hurt and anxiety to follow after. Are you not clearly mindsetted, all pedophiles are scum! All! How the hell could you stand to watch that, when you know that in reality a child's innocence would be diminished for their entire life, and soon after they would have their organs harvested or abanndoned on a street somewhere.. how the hell I cannot understand and will never and will refuse to understand, and therefore all pedophiles should be executed. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This is Canada's policy on child pornography, both real and animated Interpreting "person" in accordance with Parliament's purpose of criminalizing possession of material that poses a reasoned risk of harm to children, it seems that it should include visual works of the imagination as well as depictions of actual people. Notwithstanding the fact that 'person' in the charging section and in s. 163.1(1)(b) refers to a flesh-and-blood person, I conclude that "person" in s. 163.1(1)(a) includes both actual and imaginary human beings. – Supreme Court of Canada, R. v. Sharpe, Paragraph 38[9] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In October 2005, Canadian courts sentenced an Edmonton, Alberta, man to one year of community service for importing manga depicting child sex, possibly the first manga-related child pornography case in Canada.[10] The man was on probation at the time for possession of child pornography that featured real children. This guy got lucky, if it were me, an execution would soon follow.Puiumami

No one help this moreon please.

Injoy your banned it wont be long now

Trooper

[QUOTE="Puiumami"][QUOTE="Teuvan"]Gamespot no love loli? :(
[IMG]Your telling me, that in Lolicon, those two kids in that picture will partake in sexual activities from a grown man? , all the while it is animated. GODAMN this. I take from your post that you support Lolicon, no? because it appears you do or are being sarcastically moronic. Just thinking what would happen to them makes my stomach hurt and anxiety to follow after. Are you not clearly mindsetted, all pedophiles are scum! All! How the hell could you stand to watch that, when you know that in reality a child's innocence would be diminished for their entire life, and soon after they would have their organs harvested or abanndoned on a street somewhere.. how the hell I cannot understand and will never and will refuse to understand, and therefore all pedophiles should be executed. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This is Canada's policy on child pornography, both real and animated Interpreting "person" in accordance with Parliament's purpose of criminalizing possession of material that poses a reasoned risk of harm to children, it seems that it should include visual works of the imagination as well as depictions of actual people. Notwithstanding the fact that 'person' in the charging section and in s. 163.1(1)(b) refers to a flesh-and-blood person, I conclude that "person" in s. 163.1(1)(a) includes both actual and imaginary human beings. – Supreme Court of Canada, R. v. Sharpe, Paragraph 38[9] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In October 2005, Canadian courts sentenced an Edmonton, Alberta, man to one year of community service for importing manga depicting child sex, possibly the first manga-related child pornography case in Canada.[10] The man was on probation at the time for possession of child pornography that featured real children. This guy got lucky, if it were me, an execution would soon follow.Teuvan

GAMESPOT GONE MAD

[QUOTE="Shinitsukoshi"]

[QUOTE="Puiumami"][QUOTE="ithilgore2006"][QUOTE="Puiumami"][QUOTE="ithilgore2006"][QUOTE="Puiumami"][QUOTE="ithilgore2006"]I dislike people simply saying paedophiles should be shot. From what I understand, Paedophilia is a disease of the mind, resulting in attraction to people much younger then normal. This is not the paedophile's fault, and they shouldn't be blamed for the attraction, there's nothing they can do about it, on their own. People with this unfortunate mental illness, if they are a strong willed person, could force themselves to never act on these attractions, and behave normally all the time. This is something to be respected, and these people should be treated like everyone else. Now, weak people or worse, people who just don't care about what's right or wrong, with this illness, will not be strong enough or will simply not want to fight this, and these are the people who molest and sexually abuse children. These are the people you should be thinking of when you think "they should be shot". Although, the weak willed ones really should just be imprisoned and treated for the illness, again it's not totally their fault, even if they acted on it. But those who choose freely to act on it, and even enjoy it, yes shoot them all you like.
bigglesbear

No, you are both wrong the weak ones that can't help it need to have a pat on the back and helped, they should not be punished because they can't help them selfs.

A murderer is not weak willed idoit.

[QUOTE="-Karayan-"][QUOTE="Puiumami"] Why not?Puiumami

Ok lets say this what would you do if you were a pedifile Puiumami shot your self our get help.