Why is Gamespot advocating and sympathizing with on disc dlc, practically every member on gamespot dislikes dlc because it is so gaming companies can bank more on 12 year olds lunch money. Why can't it go back to if a game developer creates more content for a game you get it for free. You did pay for the product, sooner or later were going to have to pay for patches so we can keep playing our games online.

I really dont agree with gamespot posting this article up just because its a controversial topic and because usualy stuff like this becomes out of control on forums etc. And if its one thing I learned on the internet is that you are not going to change somebodies view point with a post saying why this is wrong or that is wrong. It's just silly when you think about it.

This is actually a really interesting and helpful find, and plus whenever you get injured you have a good reason to play video games :)

I am not enjoying this cod rut Ive been in for the past 3 or 4 years time to change it up with some bf3. And besides mw3 is ripping you off with a premium package. While bf3 is totally free.

I honestly cant find a better way to waste tax payer dollars and our time California :D

How in hell can "planting your own crops and creating your own farm" can be more fun then slaughtering enemy's in series like Call of Duty or Grand Theft Auto.

In my own opinion the xbox360 screenshots look the nicest. The ps3 screenshots are honestly just a bit too bright compared to the xbox360. Now I'm not going all like" xb0x360 1s t3h b3st" or anything Ive played ps3 and I have to say some of the games in ps3 the graphics look astounding. But right now it seems ASC2 on the ps3 is a bit too bright. The xbox360's screenshots however give a more 3d feel with the added shadow. In my opinion Im thinking xbox360 wins this round of the graphics comparison.