SmugGangster's forum posts

Avatar image for SmugGangster
SmugGangster

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SmugGangster
Member since 2009 • 43 Posts
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Seems like there are more Metal Gear Solid games coming out than all other franchises together.

Time to put the MGS franchise to rest and work on a new IP Kojima...

MGS is still fine though, until they make a contrived plo.....well....they were by MGS1 (everything is a clone when they want to avoid a plot hole), but until I say "oh great, a MGS game", I don't have a problem with it. However, I would like to see Kojima Prod. do a new ip. Bungie is in production of one and it'll be out probably in 2010-11. Yea, technically they're involved in Castlevania, but not really. That's just a name to get support, it's really by Mercury.
Avatar image for SmugGangster
SmugGangster

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SmugGangster
Member since 2009 • 43 Posts
Metal Gear has been around a lot longer. I only started experiencing it last gen.NYrockinlegend
We're talking about Metal Gear Solid, which is different. The first one was in 98, which is 3 year before Halo 1, which is considered 1 dev cycle typically. MGS, which is really a different series altogether from Metal Gear (come on now, it is!), isn't much older than Halo.
Avatar image for SmugGangster
SmugGangster

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SmugGangster
Member since 2009 • 43 Posts
Metal Gear Solid, talking about the solid series, yes, has only been around for 1 more development cycle more than halo. Now tell me, how is Halo more milked than MGS? Halo has 3 main AAA games, one spin off that got a 6.5 here (AA on metacritic, not that it matters). MGS has 4 core games (averaging AAA as well) and then Acid, Acid 2, Portable Ops, Iphone, VR Missions, rereleases (subsistance, etc.)---> the majority of these spin offs suck hard. Tell me again how Halo is more milked? Upcoming you've got 2 games a piece, so no reason to talk about those yet. (peacewalker, rising, odst, reach)
Avatar image for SmugGangster
SmugGangster

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SmugGangster
Member since 2009 • 43 Posts
[QUOTE="Wii_Gamer_277"][QUOTE="ps3wizard45"]

You Can Play alot more on PSN for free...

true but dont tell the lems that :wink:

But the 360 has Halo 3z. That game gives you easily $30 of game extra per year. Been playing it since launch.
Avatar image for SmugGangster
SmugGangster

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SmugGangster
Member since 2009 • 43 Posts
[QUOTE="SmugGangster"][QUOTE="Birdy09"] Oh well? :S what do you expect? its not exclusive... theres no way around it.Birdy09
So why do we judge consoles by the exclusives? That doesn't make any sense. If you were just looking at the numbers system wars gives, you'd be mislead to believe Mass Effect doesn't exist. The world has alliances. Team Blue: France, England, and Poland Team Red: THe US, Canada, England Team Blue: Japan, South Africa, Korea. If Team Red went to war against Team Blue, wouldn't England's troops count for their side?

Because despite what PS3/360 fanboys believe this is 1 vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 , not PS3 vs 360. a PS3 owner could have a PC so 360 having mass effect is less relevent... thats the logic it works by.

But having a Ps3 makes having a Ps3 less relevant. holy **** batman! Same logic really. If the 360 is cheaper and can play mass effect and then you get a ps3, what's the difference now? The thing is, if you're looking at it from the pc side youre not getting stuff like FF13 and Tekken 6. Again, don't hide behind multiple or else a 360 owner could include any console as well for their games, which doesn't make sense.
Avatar image for SmugGangster
SmugGangster

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SmugGangster
Member since 2009 • 43 Posts
It counts as a non exclusive.djsifer01
Which is just as good as an exclusive, right?
Avatar image for SmugGangster
SmugGangster

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 SmugGangster
Member since 2009 • 43 Posts
Think about who this board is filled with and then you already no who's gonna win. As far as artstyle goes, does MGS4 even really have a distinct one? The levels are too inconsistent.
Avatar image for SmugGangster
SmugGangster

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 SmugGangster
Member since 2009 • 43 Posts
[QUOTE="Yandere"]

[QUOTE="SmugGangster"][QUOTE="HipYoungster42"]

Not really what? That Wii is better than 360 and PS3, or that the WiiMote is more precise for aiming? If you're talking about Wii vs. 360 and PS3, then like I said, it's all about personal preferences. If it's about the WiiMote vs. dual analog in terms of aiming, then I still hold by my earlier opinion of WiiMote having more precision.

And please, don't blatantly call me a retard It just makes it harder for me to take what you say seriously.

You're gay cuz u gotz a different opiniun.

You're sending off fakeboy signals.

No, not really. I'm just using sarcasm a bit to mock some system wars logic as a whole.
Avatar image for SmugGangster
SmugGangster

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SmugGangster
Member since 2009 • 43 Posts
[QUOTE="SmugGangster"][QUOTE="Jared2720"]Umm... what? Mass Effect does count for the 360; it just doesn't count as an exclusive. It's not difficult to understand.Birdy09
But we only count exclusives here to judge consoles. Therefore, ME2 doesn't count for the 360.

Oh well? :S what do you expect? its not exclusive... theres no way around it.

So why do we judge consoles by the exclusives? That doesn't make any sense. If you were just looking at the numbers system wars gives, you'd be mislead to believe Mass Effect doesn't exist. The world has alliances. Team Blue: France, England, and Poland Team Red: THe US, Canada, England Team Blue: Japan, South Africa, Korea. If Team Red went to war against Team Blue, wouldn't England's troops count for their side?