just to keep the topic going

THEY BOTH ARE WORSE THAN CRYSIS

CRYSIS>>>>>>>> CoD4 & Halo3

; ) :P :)

[QUOTE="Kh1ndjal"]lambda a gay symbol? since when?Earthwormjam

http://www.lambda.org/symbols.htm

niceeeee

[QUOTE="robokill"][QUOTE="vfibsux"]

[QUOTE="robokill"]they have body armor, this isn't theUS army we're talking about,shoot a real man with body armor who is jacked up on adrenaline,he won't go down either. Try shooting the bad guys in the head. Alkpaz

Your joke was not funny at all, keep that BS to yourself or save it for another forum.

a: the US armed forces have recently raised concerns over soldiers not having adequate body armor, it was a valid point

b: the korean soldiers in this game have body armor

c: you're a retard

Taking about Dragon Skin which is used by the CIA but NOT the military.. that figures.. hell.. we even nuked our own marines back in the 40s.. military units = cannon fodder.

Dragonskin does not
stop the Dragonov AP round or PKC round which is
being used very frequently in Iraq. The
military-issued ESAPI plates will stop this round.
It will only stop it once or twice, but it will
stop it, which i prefer. That is the main reason
it is generally not smart to wear dragonskin.

crysis hands down, the environment the details, the suit, the ability to jump ontop of a house and knock the roof in right onto an enemy crushing him! and it runs and looks great on my computer - P4 2.4ghz, 6800 ultra, 1.25gb ram, vista 32bit, 169.01 nvidia drivers, medium settings with physics and water quality on high.

CoD4 is the same old call of duty just set in a new timeframe