SomeoneFromTDH's forum posts
I am not saying it is impossible for there to be a middle ground. I never said that and I fail to see where you got that notion. I am saying specifically that I reject the notion that a middle ground exists in matters of human rights. Either someone's person or property has been violated or it has not, and I am absolutely unwilling to be part of any compromise that involves a violation of someone else's person or property. I am saying that the problems that face us can only be solved through the voluntary interaction of freely acting individuals and that any attempt to initiate force, even for purposes that we can agree are positive, is inherently a contradiction. Someone's adherence to a moral principal - in this case nonaggression - has nothing to do with their intelligence. This is me applying the principal of nonaggression to the issues you're discussing. There can be no collective decision making in the realm of other people's property; I reject that premise as inherently aggressive and seek solutions that do not involve violence. My refusal to compromise and allow "some" aggressive violence in pursuit of whatever supposedly mutually beneficial end is not a reflection of my intellectual consideration of the matter nor the moral implications of the problems themselves.[QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="Serraph105"] Sometimes one's intelligence needs to be called into question. When someone tries to discuss areas where people can meet in the middle and work together and another person declares such a thing as impossible despite the fact there are there are examples of people doing so everyday it seems more than appropriate to question said person's intelligence. Hence why I am currently questioning yours.RushKing
"The Non Argession Principle" =/= non agression. Propertarians agree with the violence they agree with, the violence they don't notice.
Oh my Jesus PLEASE join TDH.....that our system of government has been put in place specifically designed to help the people of our country, and that taxes fund that system. Our system of government is designed to keep the landless peasants in check. It is supposed to impede democracy. The founding fathers were all rich white slave owners. The state does not want to help you. Welfare programs were established to prevent civil unrest. The liberals aren't doing their jobs anymore (They aren't getting pushed by radicals like me) , and they are aware of the instability that will follow. This is why I believe the elites started this all this NSA bullsh*t. I think YOU should join TDH. You will fit right in. http://s4.zetaboards.com/The_Daily_Happening/index/[QUOTE="Serraph105"][QUOTE="Master_Live"] What does that mean? RushKing
[QUOTE="SomeoneFromTDH"][QUOTE="SirWander"]Excuse me mister but I made this account FOUR days ago for something else entirely. What was it This is not the time or PLACE for that, Dave.Why did you create an account on here just to write that?
dave123321
[QUOTE="worlock77"]No one thinks I have mystery alts Dave I know all of your secrets.Make an alt so everyone can then assume that I'm a dave and/or brucewayne alt.
dave123321
[QUOTE="SomeoneFromTDH"] Lai is just FINE.SirWander
Why did you create an account on here just to write that?
Excuse me mister but I made this account FOUR days ago for something else entirely.
Log in to comment