actually, the difference in RDR, and many other games, is quite noticeable. And embarrassing.

KarateeeChop

All I see is a texture resolution difference. Now tell how that is significant? MW2 is freaking 600p and upscaled to 1080p. I can change the contrast, colors, hell even the brightness opition is there!

Why is that everytime a new Head to Head comes everybody deems a winner off little differences? Like say: Mw2, RDR, GTA4, etc.

"Little" differences don't signify a clear freaking winner. A "major" difference like FFXIII and Bayonetta are significant. Little differences are what we call in reality not important. Why would Eurogamer make an article about something not noticable between two games? To get hits, money, popularity, etc, etc.

[QUOTE="_Ben99_"]Better graphics ps3 : DAO 360: Fallout 3 Both: MW2SaltyMeatballs

MW2 better on 360? You guys are **** idiots to believe that. The PC is **** superior, and both the 360 and ps3 are the same.

SonnyD978

Yea and I have one.

the 360 version of fallout 3 totally smashes the ps3 version the 360 version got all the content long before the ps3 version, its all so ahead in patches that fixed problems over the ps3 version, and much like the ps3 version of oblivion the ps3 version of fallout 3 has glitches and problems not present in the 360 version. *regardless of patching*
Your best bet is to go with 360 or the PC version if you can.

MW2 the 360 version smashes the ps3 version just on simple principle of userbase alone, better intergration to jump into games...ect even though some match types don't have party chat it still smashes what the ps3 version has in this regard.

Dragon age the only game in the line up thats better on ps3, your still recommended to get the PC version which surpasses the ps3 and 360 version in graphics quality, and quality control *less glitches*

WilliamRLBaker

It smashes it by simple user base? Yea, and WoW wins over the crappy 360 by explosive numbers. Your argument is so freaking flawed.