[QUOTE="SonyFan117"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] Yeah, but the 360 was never sold for $600, either. And there's the whole three year warranty thing...DarkLink77

Doesnt matter. The ps3 was priced that high because it was coming out with new tech. Blu-ray, bigger HDD's than the 360 and so on.

It was worth the $600 when it came out and it still is today. The 360 was $400 when it came out, $80 for a wireless router, $20 for play and charge kit. Thats $500 right there, and thats without a bluray player and a measly 20gb harddrive. The ps3 came out at $600 w/ a bluray player, when bluray players were selling for $1000 at the time.

Well if you want outdated technology go ahead and stick with the 360. Ethernet cables and AA batteries, and DVD9's LOL soo much fail.

[QUOTE="BioDogshock"]Yes, I'd say so Kickin exclusives Blu ray player alone worth 200-300$Jamex1987

Go find me a QUALITY bluray player for $100 or less. Ill give you a high-five.

No. It wasn't worth it back at launch, and it isn't worth it now.

The-Mosher

Maybe if you can provide a valid argument i would take you seriously.

i do. I mostly have PS3 exclusive games, beside MW2 and orange box.

GOW3, UC2, KZ2, MGS4, LBP, GT5:P, FF13, Heavy Rain, Demon Souls, and inFamous are what my gaming library consists of.

[QUOTE="SonyFan117"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] If you want to be pay $600 for tech that's 4 years old, be my guest. No reasonable person would.DarkLink77

better than buying a console 3 times because it keeps dying on me. And not to mention the said console doesnt have features that compare to those the ps3 came with.

Doesnt matter. The ps3 was priced that high because it was coming out with new tech. Blu-ray, bigger HDD's than the 360 and so on.

It was worth the $600 when it came out and it still is today. The 360 was $400 when it came out, $80 for a wireless router, $20 for play and charge kit. Thats $500 right there, and thats without a bluray player and a measly 20gb harddrive. The ps3 came out at $600 w/ a bluray player, when bluray players were selling for $1000 at the time.

Make the switch, you wont regret it. I know i didnt.

I went through 3 360's before i got pissed and bought a ps3.

Even though my ps3 died (RSOD) which is really rare, i ended up

buying another one. Its just that much better of a console.

[QUOTE="SonyFan117"]

If it came with all the features of the launch consoles then yes it would be.

I get a ps3, ps2, and ps1, plus a blu-ray player and a computer all in one.

xbox 36---whaaaa?

DarkLink77

better than buying a console 3 times because it keeps dying on me. And not to mention the said console doesnt have features that compare to those the ps3 came with.

If it came with all the features of the launch consoles then yes it would be.

I get a ps3, ps2, and ps1, plus a blu-ray player and a computer all in one.

xbox 36---whaaaa?

[QUOTE="SonyFan117"]

[QUOTE="Dataleak"]

Killzone 2 and MGS4 could easily, EASILY be accomplished on the 360. U2 is another story though.

Bus-A-Bus

no way in hell can Killzone 2 be accomplishe don the 360 as easily as you say. MGS4 possibly, but not KZ2.

And you cant blame the developers either. The 360 had a 1 year head start on the ps3 and had much more support

from developers, and they STILL cant compete with the ps3 graphics. Hell Alan wake took 5 years to make, uncharted 2

took 2 years, and look how much superior U2 is from AW.

The proof is right in front of you guys, and yet blind lemmings still refuse to believe that the 360 is inferior (even if its not by much)

to the ps3 when it comes to graphics. Im talking about graphics only, yea i know the 360 does some stuff better than the ps3, but

this discussion is about graphics.

It is an undeniable fact that the 360 is already being pushed to its hardware limitations.

Beyond3d(actual developers) dont agree with you...and yea,i can provide a LINK ;)

It doesnt matter what BS they spew out, but the fact of the matter is that the 360 doesnt have a game comparable to KZ2 graphically.

Hell i can say that i can make a game on the 360 with KZ2 graphics, but without any proof or results my argument means nothing.

The same can be said for them. Once a game on the 360 comes out that is graphically superior to KZ and U2 i will actually acknowledge your

statement. Until then the ps3 is the superior console hardware wise.