The main difference would be related to memory accessibility. 32bit systems can only address 4GB of memory. Where 64bit systems can address much more than that.
Higher clocked single cores would actually perform better because of multiple cores are not fully optimized with the softwares . So yeah , higher single cores would be better . But hey! that takes some effort from Intel/AMD and they don't want that , so just pile up on lower rate cores and let the software developers work .dannenissan2
Clearly you have no idea what you're talking about. Look into parallelism.
I defended Left 4 Dead at the $50 price tag. You know me, I'm the Left 4 Dead nut, hell I was hyping Left 4 Dead to an absurd amount. Sure the game was lacking in content, but I thought Valve was going to support it like they said they were. It was supposed to follow the TF2 formula.
Great Valve, we're getting a new sequel barely a year after the last one came out; with alot of features that everyone wanted in the first game. Hell the first game still doesn't have all the bugs fixed. I never thought I'd say this, but **** Valve, this move is below them.
I have xp x64 and actually my games run faster than in xp x86. Plus mine boots near instantly. You guys just have to take care of your computers and your performance will be there.simardbrad
Log in to comment