How honest are the reviews at gamespot really? There's some bad games out there really, but doesn't it seem when a game's bad the gamespot reviewers go overboard with the low ratings. Take this 50 cent game that came out for PSP. It probably sucks bigtime I know, and personally I don't care the guy too much, all he ever talks about is his magic stick and wants you to lick his lollipop and all that stuff--it's disgusting. Anyway I checked the screenshots and the graphics deserved better than a 5, I mean c'mon. If you hate the game that much screw it in the tilt, give it a 0 tilt. But the graphics probably deserved better. This isn't the first time I've noticed this. Let's compare DS games. Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney, and Sprung. Same style of drawn cartoonish/anime graphics, as they're both text driven. Phoenix Wright had better ideals, a better story, more advance features leading to a much better game with an overall 8.8 score. In Sprung you try to hook up with girls or boys, depending on which gender you are, kinda fun at first, but isn't near as good. However in my opinion Sprung's drawings were much more colorful and smoothly drawn with backgrounds drawn almost as well as the characters themselves. In Phoenix Wright the drawings are nice but not as smooth and bad backgrounds. Phonix Wright recieves a 9 in graphics, while Sprung recieves a 6, go figure.

Well signing off for now, Gameplay is most important cause it affects tilt and we all know it, but don't screw over the graphics, cmon.