Like, legit some of my favorite franchises in this list....Critters 2? Yes please, take that easter bunny! Leprechaun? I'll take any as long as Warwick Davis is the lead. Return of the Living Dead 3? Loved it.
Puppet Master? One of my favorite b-movie series, the first 3 are decent, others falter as it went on, especially late 90's/2000's puppet masters.
@nibbin1191: I agree about the nudity in regards to this show, but how on earth can you say Blade Runner had no plot or concepts?
It had a clear plot and concepts that it followed through on (The main one being what it truly means to be human, which Deckard himself finds out in the end), there's a reason it's regarded as one of the best sci fi movies.
The show had the same problems back in the "farm" era, they writers just loooooooove to drag things out instead of making things more exciting and getting things moving along.
@gamingdevil800: You should check out Sea Dogs I and II, it was a great pirate themed rpg. Though a bit older now. Shame that no other people are making similar games, was really hoping this one was going to be a full fledged single player rpg, but seems not.
@Gelugon_baat: No, the reviewer directly points out how little damage his attacks do and how frustrating combat difficulty is.
If you don't know to use the rhythm to time attacks to build up your combat meter and then do a special move then your damage can be drastically reduced.
It'd be like someone playing dark souls and not knowing how to use the weapons moves or how armor affects your speed.
So many "big" review sites seem to have lost their minds at what an rpg game is or what PB games in the past (Gothic/Risen) were like.
1. It's an RPG, you are NOT meant to be level one and be able to go out and defeat every enemy/creature you've seen. You are meant to start out weak and progress over the course of the game, just like in Gothic.
2. Combat is rhythm based. I don't think most reviewers understand this. There's a GIANT bar on the bottom left of the screen, as you attack this bar "fills" up but it fills up depending on your rhythm. If you spam attacks it's very slow to build up, if you time your attacks (you'll see a while line come up that tells you when to attack again) it builds up MUCH faster and you can do special moves that dramatically increase your combat damage, this is an issue I saw in IGN and other reviews where it seems they are oblivious to this, even though it was the same in past PB games.
Bugs, I agree with, I hate them.
It feels very unfair though to knock a game so hard because the combat is too "hard" when you might not have been using it right though.
I feel like this game is what Gothic 3 should have been and seems like their best rpg since Gothic 2, it's such a shame that so many big western review sites are just pummeling though because it's "too hard" and such, even though they praise the world/exploration/story and such.
@Hagan: It's not stupid, Arya thinks that Sansa, even though she says she isn't, is really vying for power and in the end might want it over Jon. That's why when she asked her why she wanted the letter back or why it scared her it wasn't because she was afraid of Jon seeing it, but the other Lords who were talking about following her instead of Jon.
Arya is afraid that Sansa will turn on Jon and keep the North for herself.
@Argle: It's none the letter itself that Arya is concerned about, which I think some people are mis-reading into, it's the fact that she wants the letter back because she's afraid that the leaders that follow her will see it and then think less of her.
She says she wants Jon to lead but Arya has learned over these years that it's not peoples words that matter but what they do.
Both of them have changed over these years and Arya isn't trusting enough to simply jump back into being sisters like the old days.
Stiler's comments