[QUOTE="Thanatos1337"]He moded you because you were 1 spamming pictures while 2 making no attempt to actually discuss them as an insult people who believe in science. That's trolling, a clear cut case.Revinh
1 Uh, spamming pictures?
2 All those pictures are actually part of the opening post. I just didn't want to put them all at once. Making no attempts to discuss them? Um, hello? Maybe because I was busy posting the pictures? And there's the fact that I was having problems with them not showing up. I just got done posting the topic and I'm accused of ignoring people and just trolling? And why do you expect me to immediately reply? This is a forum, not a chatroom. He was too quick to judge. It seemed like an obvious abuse of power stemming from being anti-creation (and his unwillingness to consider my explanations proves that). There's also the fact that he locked the thread when the pictures weren't working yet. How does he do that when much of the topic is unknown? He claims I was posting the same things without even seeing what they are. He hardly knows the points I'm making. It was retarded and unfair in more ways than one.
I'm well aware that it is your goal in life to naively think that you can use the same refuted argument over and over again while reaming completely ignorant of how science and evolution works, all the time saying such embarrassingly fatuous and blind statements that you embarrass every Christian on these boards.Thanatos1337
You are not well aware that such empty statements don't affect me at all.
Here's the basic truth about the situation as I see it, till you actually present evidence, learn how science and evolution works, and stop embarassing theists by your obvious ignorance on the subject, I suggest you leave. Thanatos1337
If all you're going to do is ridicule and reiterate "there's still no evidence," then you should leave.
You were trolling in order to take a shot at people who believe in evolution. Which ordinarily would fly around here, but when you keep spamming photos and ignoring mods requests for explaination, threads can get locked. He isn't anti crationist, it's obvious to anybody who has read his posts that he has remained largely neutral and entirely respectful, only stepping in where there are gross misunderstadings which do seem to come about. Also if you create a thread, make sure your pics work, other wise you'll risk a lock if you've said nothing to accompany them.I think the link isn't far from the truth. The bottom line in all of this is that evolution has tremendous amounts of evidence and is supported by 99% of workers at the top national universities, government run studies, and pharmaceutical companies, while creationism has none, yes none.
I'm sorry but believing in something which has no evidence and favoring that to something that has alot of evidence is purely anti-intellectual, anti-logic, and an embarrassment to theists in general, and when theists support the rediculus notion that the earth is 6000 years old, the fossil record doesn't exist ect. they make theists look bad. That's the cold hard truth.
Log in to comment