Honestly, this is it. I'm done with Gamespot. IGN from now on.

It's not just the score. It's the fact that you this article was almost certainly written to generate controversy. Isn't it dubious that Petit in particular was chosen to rate this game? Should we add her to Feminist Frequency now?

The point is to be objective when writing these reviews. How good is the game universally? Petit, who is unquestionably biased from the onset, saw something she didn't like and docked points for it. Hence, this article is written for people who think exactly like her. It's not a valid depiction of the game.

This whole thing seems like she's trying to image herself after Anita Sarkeesian.

@SystemOnline @TheDonFanucci What is the point of a review then? It's not whether I agree with her; it's whether the review is objective. It isn't.

@SystemOnline She defined very specifically what she was talking about, and we can see from basically every other review possible that this one is incongruent.

You want to see a picture of me? I think you'll find your assumptions to be presumptuous.

@GSGuy321 Moron.

The real inconsistency of this review is its decry of misogyny, however facetious the implications may be, but praise of all other aspects related to the game. The entire game is based around illicit and morally depraved acts to an exponential degree. Is she trying to make her own hierarchy of morals?

@GSGuy321 you're an idiot