These two great opposing ideas - evolution theory & creation theory ------ actually represent the two sides of man, his mystifying dual nature: the sensory physical, and the vitally creative.

Without doubt man is an animal; and yet he is uniquely creative. How?

soren008

It's unexplainable

MAN'S speculatations about his origins fall into two well-known categories - science's evolution theory, and the world's religious and mythical accounts.

Evolution theory, according to Darwin and his followers, describes man's animal development from the first micro-organism. No explanation is offered for his incomparable creative and artistic powers. According to the theory he is just a better kind of ape.

On the other hand, biblical and other religious traditions report some kind of divine or mystical creation in which man appeared physically fully formed and imaginatively inventive as we know him today.

The two approaches are irreconcilable - until the underlying truth connecting them is realised.

:P

soren008

what's that?

hell yeaah I & I tinks dat there be no luv inda world ah gaming

for love is creation - love is de creativity & I & I see dere be no love in da buildings bare be makademchaka

jah blesss me sunshiness

soren008

exactly

[QUOTE="CoreoVII"]Why is it that whenever I think of American history, I think of Greed?felixlynch777

It was the land of opportunity, and opportunity can come in many forms.

opportunities for the government, not the people

[QUOTE="ThePartisan"]

Wow ... anybody else got some trivial BS they wanna share ...

Or is it denial of history & thinking this is anti-american .....:|

Does anyone want to answer his question with an opinion ?

Pirate700

"Yes" is not an opinion, yep ... you thought it was anti-american

[QUOTE="ThePartisan"][QUOTE="Video_Game_King"]

Seems like an attack. That'd be like calling this phrase sincere:

Can Barack Hussein Obama, supposed Muslim, friend with a former terrorist, America hater, be president of the United States?

Video_Game_King

It's History .... America did all those things ...

Nothing like that statement ..:|

Actually, it is a lot like that statement: I'm taking many common facts and using them to thinly attack somebody who is very well liked (generally).

He aint a muslim, and he doesn't hate america, what terrorist.....?

Your using assumptions ... please stop, this is ridiculously cretinous

What's the first definition, though? I'm guessing it has something to do with unwanted sex, and that's the definition most people use.

Video_Game_King

If you had read more you would have understood that there was nothing unusual about that phrase ...

A simple case of the dictionary will help you out

Seems like an attack. That'd be like calling this phrase sincere:

Can Barack Hussein Obama, supposed Muslim, friend with a former terrorist, America hater, be president of the United States?

Video_Game_King

It's History .... America did all those things ...

Nothing like that statement ..:|