@PixelAddict new Mario can't change the fact that this console is the retarded dinosaur of next gen

lol Wii U... what a joke... these guys are clueless about how to design a console

@samrvdman Did you hear? Sony says you should buy the Playstation 4.

@carlisledavid79 @The_Beanster If it is coming, and it is online with H2's old multiplayer (minus the cheating and bugs), I am all in.

But if I had a choice between H2:HD and a decent Halo 5 that returned to H2/H3 quality levels for the multiplayer, I'd rather have that.

In other news, Sony says Sony's console is good.

@CaptainGamespot Meh... the downfall of Halo began with Reach and that was all Bungie.

Anyways, I thought CE:A was fine for $30. H2 HD would also be fine for $30 though I think it's not a good idea to remake it.

@carlisledavid79 IMO H2:HD would be a horrible idea... it would just split the player base needlessly. They'd be better off just making H5 more like H2.

@AndreJr7 Well, it may be a matter of taste, but everything post-H3 has been crap for competitive/high level play, and due to the removal of ranked/social, the games have catered to fewer "tastes" overall as they pursue the wallets of the lowest-common-denominator CoD drones.

@unreal101 I can understand that. Multiplayer just interests me much more for Halo since Halo 3.

@unreal101 @The_Beanster @AndreJr7 Ohhhhhhhhhhh yes I can... at least with multiplayer. I have played and discussed and been around halo MP a lot more than pretty much any reviewer has (along with the fact that reviewers aren't given the time needed to really evaluate MP anyways). Reviews are not qualified to comment on MP quality in anything other than super generic terms.

And compared to H2/H3 multiplayer, Reach was poop and H4 is "meh... how did CoD get in my Halo??".

Reach did have a super fun campaign with some of the best level design of the series, but the story was a needless and bad retcon of Fall of Reach and the characters were just 1-D stereotypes.