[QUOTE="kardine"]
It does not change the fact that the graphics are some of the best the Wii has to offer. It does, plain and simple, have some of the best graphics, but those great graphics are coupled with a lacking style and you seem to think that those good graphics just disappear. You may not like the overall visuals of the game but the graphics are really good and ever your GS review says that.
GabuEx
I don't care what the GS review or any other review says. I have now played the game and witnessed it with my own two eyes, so I no longer need to rely on what other people have said about the game. I will grant, as I already have, that there are many technically impressive aspects in the game, such as bloom lighting, blurring of objects outside of the area you're looking at, and such like. However, technical capability for good graphics is only as good as it is used, and it is quite obvious that they were quite simply not used properly at all. Perhaps in better hands this game could have been very impressive to look at, but right now, no, it's not. You can't point to the few parts of it that look great and then expect others to just totally ignore all the stuff that doesn't look good at all.
The graphics in a game are the sum total of everything you see; you cannot evaluate the graphics of a game on the basis of the potential provided by the engine and on the sparse realization of that potential in certain parts of the game.
dude if your so picky and gonna be a graphics nazi then get a ps3 and play games with amazing graphics that aren't fun.
Log in to comment