TintedEyes' forum posts

Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts

Even with titalfall the XB1 didn't come close :lol:

Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts
the xbone is such a joke
Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts

:lol: Man so many lems are having a hard time coping with their favorite company blocking their used games.

Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts
[QUOTE="Badosh"][QUOTE="ShoulderOfOrion"]this proves that lems are more matureShoulderOfOrion
How so, lem?

they'd rather wait and see, they don't get hyped on blind faith, spamming gifs and circlejerking lems = real gamers

lol
Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]

I see no where where sony said they are giving pubs full control over drm for third parties

Snugenz

Sony stating that it will be up to publishers how they handle used games, don't remember that?. Of course you'd forget that little tidbit.

They said activation codes yes, not sure where they said the same thing as ms did, of course you would make that up

Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

[QUOTE="Snugenz"]

You asked once how i knew you were a cow, your behavior in this thread is all the evidence one would ever need to prove it. Thank You, or should i say, Thank Moooooo.

Anyway, Sony are doing the same thing (that we actually know for a fact, not just a rumour) by letting publishers determine what DRM measures they'll take.

Snugenz

I propose that we come to a mutual understanding. Since you seem absolutely determined to argue in circles stating that a console being always online is the same thing.. Let's both agree not to buy any always-on DRM protected games this generation. Think you can do that?

Because frankly, you take your rampant Lemmingism far beyond the boundaries of just loyalty to a console.  I propose that since you're championing a console that is always connected, that if you come to this agreement with me, that in about seven years every single game for your system of choice will be always-online DRM protected.  Whereas myself and supporters of the WiiU as well as PC gamers will probably still have a choice in the matter.

So, do you want to go there?  Yes or no?  Think your always-online 720 is going to have any DRMless games in about five or six years?  My guess is you are either tucking tail and leaving this thread like a house on fire or you are going to try to make this about me being a cow somehow.  Good luck with that.

Another absolute load of bollox posted by Shewgenjaa... here goes.

I've already bought two always online games this generation for my PC, but thats ridiculously besides the point.  Nowhere have i ever nor would i ever say that always online on a console is a good thing, so no i'm not championing an always online console, i'm championing common fvcking sense and patience, unlike you rabid hypocritical bovines.

Once again, 360 isn't my console of choice (it is a great console just like the other ones i own), my post history more than backs up this statement so feel free to check that out.

So now you're a supporter of the Wii U and PC?, funny i also own a Wii U and gaming PC, the latter being my primary system in fact, so i guess i'll also have a choice in the matter?.

Not being a fanboy and being open to all systems sure does feel good, but you would'nt know about that now would you...

As for the the backfire of this thread, with Sony doing the same thing, read the title of the thread muppet, "MS gives the publishers full control over each game, DRM support" which is precisely what Sony is doing in regards to third party DRM.

I see no where where sony said they are giving pubs full control over drm for third parties

Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

How about...  The fact that Diablo 3 on PS4 and PS3 won't require an internet connection to run, either?

http://www.examiner.com/article/diablo-3-ps3-and-ps4-exclusive-offline-mode-further-explained

BOOM HEADSHOT.

Snugenz

You asked once how i knew you were a cow, your behavior in this thread is all the evidence one would ever need to prove it. Thank You, or should i say, Thank Moooooo.

Anyway, Sony are doing the same thing (that we actually know for a fact, not just a rumour) by letting publishers determine what DRM measures they'll take.

What really? link
Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts
who on ms would you even kazify, there's no likeable heads over there
Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts
http://www.mcvuk.com/news/read/pre-owned-games-block-on-ps4-is-a-publisher-decision/0111344Tessellation
misleading title
Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts
there feels like there is no hype for this, meh