Have you noticed how most of the time pirates are the majority of the people complaining about DRM and copy protection and stuff, when they are the exact reason why developers put those there in the first place? I mean this sounds harsh, but how stupid can you people be? Apparently unbelievably stupid. That's right, you literally have to be a complete idiot to be a pirate. You like playing games, but don't even realize that you are ruining PC gaming as we know it. And if you try to defend piracy, don't bother, because that will just give away the fact that you are a pirate yourself, because the only people that actually support piracy are the pirates themselves.

DRM is not a valid excuse people, because whenever a game doesn't have DRM or any copy protection on it it almost gets more pirated than one with it. World of Goo, Prince of Persia, Sins of a Solar Empire, all games that were pirated like crazy, yet didn't have any copy protection at all, so stop using that as an excuse. Also stop using the excuse it's a bad game so I'm not going to pay for it. That excuse makes no sense. How would you know it's bad until you play it, aka, you made the decision to pirate it before you know how good or not it was, and if you played the demo, then you should have known it was bad in the first place and just not bought it. Not to mention, if a game is bad, why play it in the first place? Oh I know, it's just another poor excuse.

Just admit it pirates, the absolute only true reason you pirate games is because you don't want to pay for them. You're selfish, and think stealing is ok as long as the technicaldefinition of piracy isn't theft. Guess what, it's basically stealing, stop trying to find irrelevant loopholes to justify your own careless greed. There is not one valid excuse pirates can give, because when you really get down to it, the only reason you are pirating is because you don't want to pay for it, end of story.

Armalite1016

if your looking for a game to entertain you for months and months, get oblivon, while it is lacking in a few areas it is fairly fun unless you are one of those hard core 30 year old fallout fanboys. Mass Effect is a better game imo, but its short, about 15 hours a play through if you don't rush or go slow on purpose, and its probably good for 2-3 playthroughs if you like it. with_teeth26

30 year old?

Dude.. I'm 18, and I played the original Fallout for days on end when it was released.. you don't have to be even near 30.

In fact, I only know one person who ever played it, that's near 30 now.

And I believe you were talking about 'Fallout 3', not 'Fallout' there's a huge difference in game play. Though I prefer the originals, I still think Fallout 3 was pretty well done.

I have.. very mixed feelings with this game.

Like many others of the past 2 years (Assassin's Creed, Far Cry 2, Army of Two etc) it was very hyped and advertised in a great fashion.. Perhaps advirtising was too good, as those games (inc. Mercs 2) didn't quite live up to what they were expected to be.

I don't believe it was worth the money, but if you manage to attain a copy (in whatever way) then it can be fun to pass some time, and the co-op has it's pros.

It's painfully repeatative though.