He's just tweeting his rights to bare arms and rights for freedom of speech... Making threats against someones life does not constitute freedom of speech. This man will be arrested. Already sent a report in.
[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="thebest31406"][QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"] Ok? And? You want them to convict Zimmerman of a crime he didn't commit because a woman was convicted of a crime she did? What was the crime? Shooting warning shots is illegal. Indeed. Shoot to kill. Unless you have bullshit Geneva conventions to work with. /Militaryproblems
[QUOTE="thebest31406"] Yes well, one is directly linked to terrorist and hate activity. The other is at most, a group of political instigators. A better comparison would probably be the tea party. That said, Sharpton is slime who simply goes after individuals rather than truly tackle the problem of racism in the US. But who is Bill Cosby when it comes to race relations. Is he an expert? News to me.
thebest31406
Bill Cosby is a noted actor, comedian and humanitarian. His most famous roles are Dr. Huxtable and Fat Albert. He created a lot of controversy when he called out poor blacks for their speech patterns (I am guessing ebonics), spending habits (grills maybe) and parenting at an NAACP ceremony. He has a point. As you noted, Sharpton is slime who is a race baitor and not someone who is really willing to help. At lest Jesse Jackson has done something (I remember his Up With Hope rallies back in the 70s though I didn't go to it when he came to the area I lived when the rest of the school went to it) over the years.
LOL yeah I know who Cosby is and I am very familiar with his rant. Being frustrated at the condition of Black folk is understandable. Screaming at them because of their names or how they talk or what they drive while completely ignoring state and institutional discrimination helps no one. It's just a racist rant that isn't unlike what you'd see from a stormfront post. I've read about the Up with Hope rallies. Today, Jackson just seems much quieter. Honestly, I don't even know what he does now. Sharpton on the other hand is simply a damn fool dressed Civil Rights clothing who loves the camera. From Imus to MJ, now this junk. There is no such thing as state and institutional discrimination. Get over yourself peasant..
[QUOTE="k2theswiss"] If the male does not want a child, and you refuse to get an abortion, then he should not be held account able for child paymets
[QUOTE="k2theswiss"][QUOTE="UnMonk"]Until males get the option to abort the child, be free from child support payments, get a birth control pill, and thousands of "male health clinics" I dont give two shits about female problems. worlock77
I think both should have to sign off on it. IF one chooses not to sign off on it. well too bad, you knew the risk
Sorry, but no. Especially since the father can easily walk away often with no real repercussions.
Fathers can not walk away with no repercussions. Males always pay child support, even if the mother is a shitty mother, and abandoned her children.
Log in to comment