Lol, not exactly. Technically it's just half the machine it could and should have been. People saying they are satisfied with it kinda amaze me considering that half of its silicon is missing. It ain't really tearing up the place in the games department either.
though I wouldn't be worry but it does explain why there were so many Witcher 3 PS4 reviews then it is.
Isn't it obvious why they're waiting as long as possible for the PC version to get out there? It's because of pirates. Had they sent out a review build of the PC version it would have gotten into the hands of pirates instantly and been downloaded hundreds of thousands of times before the game's launch. Then there'd be 1000X more Twitch streams of it airing right now than there currently is.
How thoughtful of them. They even left intact the broken AI so those previous Xbox fans can experience the lies and deceit first hand.
I'm so glad Sony are above cash grabs, their generosity is seemingly endless between this and separate online subscription fees for games and every media function.
Xbox One has power of 10 Xbox 360 consoles, says Microsoft
And the company says the power becomes "infinite" with cloud technology, which game developers have been "incredibly positive" about
Yeah, they like to say that but it's PR bullshit. GPU is 5X as powerful as X360 and the CPU difference is less than that.
Sorry I'm not buying a GeoW remaster unless it's a trilogy compilation. To have just one game remastered and sold at what's probably going to be $30-40 bucks is ridiculous. Give me a trilogy, all running at 60 fps, uprezzed, with better audio, and he'll, I may even humor reactivating my LIVE account just to play it while also paying $49-$59.
But just one game that's 9 years old?! **** off. A waste of my time and money.
Yeah, I agree. A remastered trilogy all in one package, or even better yet all 4 of the games, I would definitely buy. But meh to just one of them.
I don't bother with gaming on a pc cuz it's too damned complicated. People tell me all the time that isn't true but bullshit! Case in point: A few months ago I was considering actually buying a game for PC, the original Witcher during a Steam sale. Then I discovered it has no native controller support. So I thought maybe a workaround exists somewhere and was just about to google and then thought "Screw this! The whole reason I've stayed away from PC gaming is crap like this and the very first time I consider giving it a try again I get more crap right out of the gate." At that I said screw buying Witcher for PC regardless of how cheap it was and screw PC gaming ... again. And for those that say "Just play it with a mouse and keyboard" I say the day I'll play a 3rd person game with a mouse and keyboard is the day that Invasion of the Body Snatchers becomes real cuz if you see me playing Witcher like that it isn't me, it's a pod.
If it's really just the first one I don't care. Needs to be a collection to be interesting. People will forgive doing nothing but upping framerate and resolution if it's a collection. But if it's just one game they'll want more than that.
Btw, GOW was definitely NOT as gray as that pic. No, it's not the most colorful game in the world, especially the night scenes, but that's intentional. But it isn't as monochrome as that pic makes it seem.
I didn't call this. I really didn't. I mean, I loved Witcher 1 and 2. Its my type of game. It's made with TLC, its a great world, but I didn't ever think this series would get this far with the rest of the public.
I'm going to play the shit out of this game, I can't wait.
Well, it's only a few points higher than what Witcher 2 scored so far. Not like Witcher 2 was received poorly by critics.
@misterpmedia: Because they would rather circle jerk about framerate problems on consoles.
Half a dozen have already made comments about it.
Glad they fixed it.
I doubt it's actually fixed. Fixed would mean a steady 30 fps throughout. It's not like the review copies are old. I don't believe they've totally alleviated framerate problems like what some critics have been talking about in a week. Improved it a little perhaps, but actually fixed seems unlikely.
Log in to comment