I think the 19-30 range seems reasonable - there's no rush.
I don't, however, understand the want or need to only have sex with the person you're going to spend the rest of your life with. It seems awfully old fashioned and a bit too traditional for me. You could love someone and not have sex until marriage, and then find out the sex is horrible and there's no real chemistry there. But, you've got to spend the rest of your life with that person. I'm not sure I could handle that.
raynimrod
I remember having this argument/debate with you before (you probably don't remember), but I believe that if two people are really in love, sex together will always be passionate and great for them.
[QUOTE="F1_2004"][QUOTE="zeta"] *sigh* answering as if I didn't know that prior to posting. I was questioning the further relevance of the term. zeta
well that's why people use it, to say "pics inside" without actually saying all of that... That, I also know. I can't ask the further relevance. given that more people have broadband, and more people are switching to 3 or 4G nodes?
I think what he is saying people don't really write it to warn 56K'ers anymore, now it is just a way to say, 'the thread you are about to enter contains many pics.'
In all seriousness, one of my favourite TV series is Still Fresh prince. I was genuinely sad when I watched the last episode. It was hard to know they were finally done.
Log in to comment