Some people dont give a **** if it's terrible for them, they would rather drink something they enjoy rather then care that it might kill them one day. Would you rather go through life eating/drinking what you enjoy or would you rather restrict yourself to only water, brown rice and chicken breats just because it is more healthy and you might live a bit longer? Even if you want to get extremely fit having a few soft drinks now and again isn't going to kill you or hinder results.

It's all about fitting it into a healthy life style. I'd hate to go through life never eating any "bad" foods now and again. Most insanely fit people take a trip through the drive-thru or bust open a Pepsi after a hard days work every so often.

Watching two people **** is bad for you? Seriously, how do people believe any of this BS. Porn addiction is laughable and how many people are seriously addicted to porn? You don't need porn to have an orgasm. It'd probably be more accurate to say they are addicted to sex in general, or even masterbating rather than porn. Banning porn would just push it underground and cause even more problems.

Casually viewing porn isn't negatively affecting anything. There is no difference between doing that and using your imagination or having sex. I just laugh at people who are on the anti-porn BS. Why dont you guys go attack a real issue?

They are a bunch of religious nutjobs who think Canada needs to become the United States in the 1950's. If they actually win, it will be a sad day in Western civilization.Zeviander

The Majority of people tend to be theists, so atheists naturally live in a world where religion is dominant. It's not that atheists are "obsessed" with the disbelief in god, or even the belief of those who are religious, in fact it's incredibly hilarious when the religious try to label the atheists as the bigots/loud mouth's when many atheists could give a less of a **** about religion or what other people believe. It's just amazes me how so many people can get butthurt over absolutely nothing.

Why label atheists, probably one of the most hated groups in America or rather even the world as people "obsessed with their disbelief" Turn on the ****ing news, go outside, how many religious people do you see? Is it really hurting you that much to see one atheist who is proudly stating he is an atheist? Or a small group of atheists saying "come learn something?" Man I see Christians do that everyday, and are you seriously going to justify that by saying "Well they are supposed to" and then hit on atheists for doing the same exact thing on a much smaller scale?

It's just hilarious to see Christians cry over the supposed "attacks" on their religion when their religion dwarfs atheism into the ground. Yet apparently atheists must be obsessed to deny the existence of god, am I right? Or maybe it is you who are the one obsessed, or maybe it's because you cant make a rational argument outside of "I know god exists"" and it pisses you off when somebody destroys your entire argument with rationality, evidence and some good ol'D logic?

Why believe in something without evidence? That's what I don't understand, how christians can so devoutly follow something that has never been proven to exist. Do you honestly think the creator of the entire universe would give two ***s if you believe in him or not? There is no logic at all in the "if you dont believe you go to hell" **** If a god does exist (and I say that only to make a point) it would be extremely unlikely he would send somebody or anybody to burn for an eternity simply for not believing in him. Your geographical location is what tends to determine your religion, so which religion is the right one? Under Islam it is YOU Christians that are going to burn.

Why do you not believe in the Islamic god then? Wouldn't it be safer to just accept him along with your god? All Atheists do is take it one step further.

Better then any of the Republican candidates (minus maybe Ron Paul, but he's got no chance at this point)

Can we trust Obama though? Nope

He's lived most of his life in prison and it's practically all he knows. The world as it is now would probably scare him, you know, with all of these little Justin Biebers running around these days and everything.

It's called an unfalsifiable hypothesis. The burden of proof doesn't lie on the one who isn't making the claim, and just because you cant disprove something doesn't mean it's true. I know this example has been used countless times but, if I were to tell you I had a best friend who only I could see and talk to, would you believe that my best friend actually exists? Of course not, and if you did you'd be an idiot (no offense)

Using scriptures and the bible for evidence is the most ridiculous thing any christian can do in an argument for their religion. It's the equivalent to Muslims claiming their religion is the true one because of the Qua'ran. How many times has the bible been translated? Why does it say the world is only 6000 years old? Why does it say the world is flat? Why does it say the Earth is at the center of the universe? Why is their so much plagiarism in it from previous scriptures? Why does it say the world was created in 7 days? How come we know all of what the bible has said about man being created, the planets age and shape is false yet people still believe in the other sh*t it has to say?

You want to know why? Because there is always an excuse. "The bible wasn't written by god, it was written by men so of course their is going to be errors" and if that's true, why believe what it has to say in the first f*ucking place? If there is so many apparent errors in the bible now, why still believe in it? You cant theoretically disprove my imaginary best friends existence either, and the funny thing is, it would be much harder to do than trying to disprove your gods.

I already took that Meyers-Briggs personality test and I keep getting INFP. so I'm going Introverted.

WiiCubeM1

A bit of both, like most other things.