Well, keep in mind many many developers have blatantly said they have no relationship with sony what so ever forcing devs to work harder on ps3 games. The situation is a lot better than it was before, but I still see the PS3 behind in graphics.

Why those games of all games? I'd have used games people actually care about.

LOL! Wrong game to do in Spanish EA. Fifa? hell yeah, but not this one.

Jesus, the PSP list is embarrassing. Those are good games, but they happen to be the best games on the system, not over looked ones. The idea of the feature is great, but it didn't turn out so well.

Damn fool those pokemans is hot hot hot

I know the graphics are better but the feature is terrible. Half of the GoW 1 screens look better.

I agree with all 10 points, but I would like to point out that I'm not a big Final Fantasy or MGS fan so even if they fix things such as the online (which will be hard if its free) they still have a lot to win me over.

Well it is Sony here guys. They are a business (who just happened to throw away one of their key outs) They have cut corners before and this is quite a typical business decision to do. Yet I as a consumer understand that the only way to make it stop is to not buy it. Thus my conclusion is: If you're not happy with the PS3, just don't buy it.

Definitely something to analyze here. I myself am not going to upgrade for some time, I'm pretty happy with my current set up. Most of the results are typical, including the low memory low FPS, yet there were a few mild upsets.

I'm a bit partial to the Colts, and thus I'm rooting for them. Yet they really need to be playing good, solid, mistake free football if they want to take a good shot at the Bears. The Bears defense is one tough mutha, and if Grossman brings a decent game don't be shocked to see the Bears take this one by more than 10 points.