_rpg_FAN's forum posts

Avatar image for _rpg_FAN
_rpg_FAN

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 _rpg_FAN
Member since 2005 • 1418 Posts
[QUOTE="2-10-08"]

I prefer my shooters to have analog control.

too bad we dont have gamepads for pc / end sarcasm
Avatar image for _rpg_FAN
_rpg_FAN

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 _rpg_FAN
Member since 2005 • 1418 Posts

Sims will be ported to consoles eventually, and most likely any future half-lives. So for a person who dislikes RTS, there really isn't much.

2-10-08

hmmm you are comparing console crysis to pc crysis?? :roll:

(and no you dont need core i7 to play crysis on very high, its just that guy from that picture used it)

+ PC STILL HAVE:

best racing SIM (or any SIM for that mather)

best FPS games

best STRATEGY games

best MMO games (or any otherONLINE game )

best WRPG games

best CASUAL games

most FREE games

MODS

modding tools

etc etc

Avatar image for _rpg_FAN
_rpg_FAN

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 _rpg_FAN
Member since 2005 • 1418 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="edo-tensei"] lo and now it's you making the immature and ignorant comment assuming valve would be wasting their money on ps3. lolwut?edo-tensei
You don't know about the software sales, do you?

what? about ea porting the orange box and not valve, yeah i knew that, so? ea was doing the porting not valve

they still have to PAY to get porting done and EARN by selling game if PAY > EARN its no good why waste money and resources when you can EARN and pay little?
Avatar image for _rpg_FAN
_rpg_FAN

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 _rpg_FAN
Member since 2005 • 1418 Posts

i lol @some ppl that DONT KNOW HOW TO BUILD THEY OWN PC but yet can "diss" some of best developers on face of earth...

something is fishy here and im not talking about that guy sitting next to me

truth is - valve CAN and DID create game for PS3 before so its not that they dont know how to do it or something as ridiculous like that.

point is - its not economical

risk-benefit ratio is not good so why waste resources and time

imagine if World of Warcraft was to come to PS3

they would have to make LOT of things from scratch

for what?? for that few milions more?

they allready have so many players they dont need more, they would just potentialy loose money trying to port it to ps3

Avatar image for _rpg_FAN
_rpg_FAN

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 _rpg_FAN
Member since 2005 • 1418 Posts
Sounds like some of the employees at Valve need to start taking some classes at Naughty Dog University.Jared2720
hmmm valve >>> naughty dog anytime
Avatar image for _rpg_FAN
_rpg_FAN

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 _rpg_FAN
Member since 2005 • 1418 Posts
Yeah, that's without a monitor, or a decent sized HDD, or any other peripherals, and when you say can play Crysis, you mean on medium/low, which to be honest isn't 3 times the power of PS3. bobbetybob
i didnt know that you get monitor / HD TV with your x360 or ps3 :roll: + crysis medium >>> x360 ps3
Avatar image for _rpg_FAN
_rpg_FAN

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 _rpg_FAN
Member since 2005 • 1418 Posts

My personal favourites are Silent Hill games

no other game created that "psychological" fear that last even when i stop playing game for a while

Avatar image for _rpg_FAN
_rpg_FAN

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 _rpg_FAN
Member since 2005 • 1418 Posts

thats great article

Avatar image for _rpg_FAN
_rpg_FAN

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 _rpg_FAN
Member since 2005 • 1418 Posts
[QUOTE="crispytheone88"]

[QUOTE="gaboi09"]

*was reading some of the commnets left by readers of the report, and this reply reflects exactlyhow I feel about it!!*

How was GT4 stagnant?

"DAHHH IT NOT EASY FOR ME! AND WHUR MAH DAMAGE AT1111!!!"

It's still the better racing sim.

Though Forza 2 sure was a hell of a lot more fun, but it was a much worse Sim.

I can't imagine Forza 3 being much different.

Frankly, this is just how it is with these kind of things. The Japanese pay insane attention to really stupid details, whereas the West just tries to make it fun.

I don't totally agree with you

I have played forza 2 to death

I have also played GT4 to death

The fine details, like engine noise, GT is crazy accurate, Forza not as much, the driving details though seem really really close, the way the cars react are amazing for both games, but for me the nod goes to Forza

If you hit someone, or a wall, and lose you wing, of even a front fin, you lose downforce, and that effects the cars driving dynamics, this all works in forza 2, I won a game the other day after bashing up a really fast race car, and having to limp my way through the race without a front fin, awesome awesome awesome, i just won.

well both are unrealistic compared to true sim games lol
Avatar image for _rpg_FAN
_rpg_FAN

1418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 _rpg_FAN
Member since 2005 • 1418 Posts

EA is great too many people badmouth it without reason