[QUOTE="SaL_92"]wow, so what? it still is better than any game the ps3 hasThisIsSW

I prefer Resistance, thanks.

Like you had a choice

racing genre = GT5 makes forza 2 look like its really last gen

action genre = heavenly sword makes ninja gaiden 2 look like ninja gaiden 1.2

FPS = killzone 2 makes halo 3 look very meh

adventure = uncharted blows away anything on 360

RPG = ff13 destroys all

discuss

tidus222

racing genre = GT32 makes forza48 look like its really last gen

action genre = heavenly sword 8 makes ninja gaiden5 look like ninja gaiden 3.2

FPS = killzone6 makes halo3.14 look very meh

adventure = uncharted blows away anything on 360 (cause we all now everyone has played it)

RPG = ff24is better than sex

IDIOT

[QUOTE="aholtz"][QUOTE="wergfwefwef"][QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"][QUOTE="killerkop"][QUOTE="projectpat2007"]

$50 bucks a year is still alot of money IMO, if you own a 360 and have live for 4 years thats $200 bucks.

wergfwefwef

stop trying to spin it to fit your likings or ideas

50 bucks a year is expensive for something that is free everywhere else

free everywhere else? what is "everywhere else" lots of things on xbox live is exclusive and can only get there, so how could it be everywhere else. because were not just talking about online play. Besides, there is only ONE OTHER CONSOLE that has online play at the moment. and that is ps3, and the online on that sucks.

The online play is pretty much the same on both systems. Sure you have more online games right now for the 360 but the experience is the same until HALO3 then its over for PS3 as online play is concerned but thats another thread. But the online services that are offered are not even close to even waste time to complare. Even though I did waste my time ealier by doing a brief comparison.

reasons why xbox live gameplay is better than ps3 online gameplay. ( numbers dont mean best or worse reasons, just there to show how many theyre are.)

1. no ranking system for PS3 online gameplay like there is on Xbox live

2. No reputation or recommendation system, to recommend good players, or complain about glitching players on PSN, but that is available on xbox live.

3. Majority of online players in ps3 community dont own a microphone, leaving your tactics for other players to go to waste, however almost all xbox live players own microphones due to the including of a headset in the premium xbox 360 package.

4. No guest player feature on ps3 online play, only one online player in a game for every console, unlike xbox 360 which has a guest feature.

5. no Gears, command and conquer, halo 3, and more.

6. no gamer zones which represent gaming style and influence player matchmaking (Recreation, Pro, Family, Underground) on online PS3, like there is on xbox live.

7. no Recent player list, which lists the last 50 players one user has played with on PS3 online play, like on xbox live.

8. PS3 supports playing online with other ps3 consoles, in which xbox live has a new system called "LIVE anywhere" which is an initiative by Microsoft to bring theLIVE online gaming and entertainment network to a wide variety of platforms and devices, including Xbox, xbox 360, Windows Vista, Windows Mobile, Zune, and more.

9. better security system on xbox live, which assures that modified machines or systems of unknown origin cannot access live.

He did what I didnt feel like doing.

Thx

[QUOTE="coltss"][QUOTE="OhSnapitz"][QUOTE="coltss"][QUOTE="OhSnapitz"]

In the long run the PS3 is more expensive when you add bluray movies into the mix...

OhSnapitz

whos talking about blu ray movies here isnt this just comparing online services? Allright, you could always rent and thts what i do i dont go buy movies i only rent and what if you have a HD DVD on your 360 then what costs more?

If this is just about comparing Online services, then why are so many fanboys talking about bluray, and wifi, and HDD ect..? :|

Fact of the matter is you don't need XBL to enjoy the 360 just like you don't need bluray movies to enjoy the PS3.. However you people are stating it like you need Live when you get a 360.. It's an extra service the 360 provides, nothing more... Use it or don't, you still can have a blast playing the games, as I do. But as long as fanboys are going to add the cost of live in the equation (mostly to make the already pricey PS3 seem "less expensive" :roll: ) Then I'm going to keep bringing up the bluray argument because as I already stated in this thread... The PS3 is a VERY powerful system without br, but Sony is pushing it so hard because they want to own the rights to the next (and most likely only) disc media.

Almost evry1 plays online thts y its important to count it. does every one buy movies? no , mostly all people rent

The 360 is sitting at what... 11 million sold. 6 million of those users have live accounts according to M$ However they never specified if they're gold or silver accounts so that's roughly half (or less) of the 360 users are actually playing online games. That's not "almost everybody" my friend.. :| And as I said before if you're gonna use an optional feature like Live, then I'm gonna use an Optional feature like bluray movies... Because as I've said numerous times already.. what's the point in getting a BR player if you don't buy any movies for it..

Cause chicks dig the BR

psn is like net zero its horrible.F1sTDaCuffS

It would be horrible if I had to pay for it. But its free so it just sucks for now :D

[QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"][QUOTE="killerkop"][QUOTE="projectpat2007"]

$50 bucks a year is still alot of money IMO, if you own a 360 and have live for 4 years thats $200 bucks.

wergfwefwef

stop trying to spin it to fit your likings or ideas

50 bucks a year is expensive for something that is free everywhere else

free everywhere else? what is "everywhere else" lots of things on xbox live is exclusive and can only get there, so how could it be everywhere else. because were not just talking about online play. Besides, there is only ONE OTHER CONSOLE that has online play at the moment. and that is ps3, and the online on that sucks.

The online play is pretty much the same on both systems. Sure you have more online games right now for the 360 but the experience is the same until HALO3 then its over for PS3 as online play is concerned but thats another thread. But the online services that are offered are not even close to even waste time to complare. Even though I did waste my time ealier by doing a brief comparison.

[QUOTE="aholtz"][QUOTE="coltss"][QUOTE="SegArgyle"][QUOTE="Redfingers"]

[QUOTE="SegArgyle"]50 bucks a year isn't nothing when you spend 50 to 60 bucks a gamecoltss

It's annual. Add it up. If $50 a year is nothing, $200 is nothing, so the argument goes.

I don't quite see what your trying to get back at me, fifty bucks a year for 6 years isn't nothing, when your spending 50 to 60 bucks a game 2 or three times a month, so what's the big deal about 50 bucks a year for a subscription, thats like 15 dollars more than most magazine subscriptions, that nothing

so your saying it wont matter if you pay 50 bucks a year.IT MATTERS its some money and if your comparing to the ps3 you pay nothing

You get what you pay for right now. You pay nothing you get nothing. Once Sony steps up their services do you really think its still going to be free. CMON

Home isnt the next step? by the way its free

As I saidif you really think when everything is done. And I know about Home. Do you reallyand Imean really think its going to be free.You are going to have to pay for something at some point. No company will ever put this much work into something and not get a$$$ return somewhere.

[QUOTE="SegArgyle"][QUOTE="Redfingers"]

[QUOTE="SegArgyle"]50 bucks a year isn't nothing when you spend 50 to 60 bucks a gamecoltss

It's annual. Add it up. If $50 a year is nothing, $200 is nothing, so the argument goes.

I don't quite see what your trying to get back at me, fifty bucks a year for 6 years isn't nothing, when your spending 50 to 60 bucks a game 2 or three times a month, so what's the big deal about 50 bucks a year for a subscription, thats like 15 dollars more than most magazine subscriptions, that nothing

so your saying it wont matter if you pay 50 bucks a year.IT MATTERS its some money and if your comparing to the ps3 you pay nothing

You get what you pay for right now. You pay nothing you get nothing. Once Sony steps up their services do you really think its still going to be free. CMON