Hey there. Decided to write mini-blogs more often. Shortened language to be expected hereon in. Apparently I'm a swot. Hence the title. So, i always do tutorial readings. I always like to say stuff in the teaching-time (not allowed to say c to the lass). I want to get my money's worth, teachingwise, out of my university education. not just the bit of paper at the end, P's-get-degrees style. (P is a Pass, kinda like a D). So today, the English lecturer, because we are lucky enough to have her as a tutor, tells us to start the last book of the course. (It's been a 60s pop-culture course, mostly). I've already read it. I make a comment, it's a funny book (The Edible Woman by Margaret Atwood). She agrees. No one else has started it. Does that make me a swot? I don't think so. We have three books to read in a semester. Last semester, in fin de(19th) siecle, we had ten or eleven full novels. Case two. We got our history minors back yesterday. Who was/was not a gentle(wo)man in 16th Century England. I got 85. An HD. (A+...?). My second in two years, after first year. Apparently to begin with, that makes me swottish (though I did beat the girl who finished ahead of me in year 12 history- at least I got the history prize then, and am beating her now). But I 'accidentally' left the end of a sentence/paragraph. And in the same tutorial, I anticipated the tutor's comment on why servants wouldn't be allowed the vote... (same as recent arguments against women- one household, one vote). Apparently that's swottish too? So... I like to know what's going on. But I don't think swot is quite right. I dunno. Anyway. DRAMA. Pretty minor stuff, but it feels like a lot is going on atm. And it's not just my stuff that needs to be got together, there's been a seriously interesting-to-watch break up within my friends (that was shi to the znit that got censored. Apparently that is a naughty word). BUT... the girl who you almost definitely do not remember me blogging about two years ago is being real close again. It's totally going to be my turn to reject her this time. And she shall learn her lesson and it shall be good. But I have a much better rationale behind it than she did oh so long ago. Actually, it would be close to three years.... weird. BTW, Up was not as good as Wall-E. Close, but no cigar. Maybe a whiff of the smoke after the person smoking it has left the room.... GOODNIGHT AND GOOD LUCK! (I'm tired. This is totally not not getting the principle that it may not be night when you read this. It just means I'm being authentic and loyal to my own current personal timeline.)
Log in to comment