[QUOTE="xYamatox"]
[QUOTE="FoolwithaLancer"]
So we're going off of pure speculation that Gamespot doesn't aknowledge 7-7.5 as a "Good" score (They would have changed it by now if they thought that way) Instead of the cold hard facts that are right under that oh so "terrible" score 7.5?
FoolwithaLancer
inFamous 1: 9/10
inFamous 2: 7.5/10
It is general knowledge that inFamous 2 is the same if not better than inFamous 1 in a lot of ways. So where did the 1.5 difference come from?
Read the review. They gave it a low score for Quote
"Laughable Morality sytem, Unbalanced Combat, and Uneven pacing."
Two of those reasons are pretty big.
yeah but they are not true. the man said his self that he only used his favorite powers thats why the gameplay was unbalanced. the gameplay is balanced just fine the only time the fighting gets unbalance is whwn people make ugc with too many enemies.
He calls the morality system laughable and uses an inaccurate example of blowing away everyone in a hostage situation saying you get good karma which is blatantly false. (lol there is actually a sign that comes up and say bad karma killed hostages)
Also the moraility actually changes the game this time unlike putting just a different tent like the original. He says the choices are not gray like the original original : do I let this guy get hung or walk away? imfamous 2 : is it right to sacrifice thousands to save millions? and it's a **** open world game the pacing depends on the player.
review was terrible I cant belive a professional wrote it.
Log in to comment