@chippiez Yeah, you should worry that companies are spending literally millions of dollars on marketing to try to compensate for mediocre games.

If you think these big companies care about making good games you're delusional. Ubisoft, like EA and others, is just trying to sell as many copies as it is possible before reviews are in.

@enriK233 @ampiva Actually, mine doesn't.

@PS2fweak @ampiva That just means marketing is working.

@mkeezay22 @ampiva You should care, unless you want a monopoly:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2014/05/26/why-watch-dogs-is-bad-news-for-amd-users-and-potentially-the-entire-pc-gaming-ecosystem/

This game is NOT GOOD. I played for three days (no desire anymore) and first of all, it isn't anything like the original trailer; everything has been reduced 'press x to awesome' and there's no real incentive to be a spy when the game has so much focus on shooting. It's even less technologically impressive than GTA IV. Oh, and the car physics are awfully arcade.

Great job on another paid review. Gamespot. Ironically, the description for this game says: "Watch Dogs is an open-world action adventure game from Ubisoft where you must use any means at your disposal to take down a corrupt system."

By the way, PC users, the port is awful; the performance is terrible and the game has been programmed to run 40% slower on AMD cards, thanks to the developer's partnership with nvidia.

So why does Lara have a manjaw now? Is she trans?

Wow, this really looks like bad. Should have made it a VN, it would have resulted much better.

How do I get a job as a games reviewer? It must be cool having a paycheck and addionally having publishers give you more money for writing shit reviews filled with buzzwords and inflated scores.

Where are you getting all these shitty reviewers, Gamespot? I missed when this site had at least a bit of integrity. Really, a 9?

I guess the publisher didn't pay enough? Every CoD game fits this description except for the difficulty.