Star wars? What you on about? They showcased a bunch of titans falling out the sky and people running along walls. They didnt disconcert any aspect of the game or shying away from specific elements, they simply didnt deliver a campaign, or even make a liable attempt at one, every review ever on that game bashes the lack of a fluid structural campaign yet the score remains so high, as it should. What im trying to say is people invested so much though into what they wanted to be a perfectly unprecedented unimaginable campaign for Destiny that a more than decent game got points shunned off of a review while not paying much attention to other aspects of the game.

We all expected a lot more from Titanfall, and once the game release and everyone found out the game literally had a few useless lines of dialogue thrown into the same 'repeated' online matches and called it 'campaign', the game was still fun. Give it a near perfect score. Here we have a game that had a go at combining 2 genres and the guy focuses on, dare i say, a single element of the game, shaving off point after point because a game in which you primarily shoot things got boring because all he did was shoot things. Im a little confused how COD with jetpacks got a near perfect score and destiny got a below par score. Reviews are generally bad on all sites nowadays.

(I love both games, and would have given both an 8/8.5)

Look how many playstation owners cannot STAND this article! Its surprising how many people you see call a company such inexcusably rude names just for competing when all you ever hear is Phil Spencer calling Sony 'friends'. Pull that playstation move out from your backside and admit both console have good games.