I've posted a new review for Global Agenda.

It's exceptionally long-winded but hopefully useful to some people.
It's come to my attention that i'm not paying as close attention to my writing as I should be, but I imagine useful critique of new gaming investments outweighs the average game researcher's desire for well-written material. Besides, it's not like i've written it in boneheadspeak.

Most reviews I wish to write are for things I have not had enough time to play enough to review adequately before a lot of other people beat me to it. There's no point in writing about something that's been reviewed to death already, is there?
Question of redundancy aside, i'll try to keep reviewing the things that I took some sort of risk on or that has little useful press coverage.

-A