[QUOTE="blowsis3"]Damn the crysis 3 multiplayer beta really sucks. The textures seriously arent better than killzone3 multiplayer and the gameplay's the goddamn same as crysis 2 it just feels like a map pack for crysis 2 oh yea the maps pretty much suck too.jun_aka_pekto
I have KZ3. A far bigger number of KZ3's textures in the MP maps suck far worse than those in Crysis 2.
lol crysis 3 beta has textures recycled from crysis 2 no joke the crappy cinderblock texture from crysis 2. killzone3 has much better textures dude.
Sick of all these military shooters. crysis 3 beta sucks but it's still better than all these other iron sight shooters atleast it's not trying to be a pure military shooter.
Damn the crysis 3 multiplayer beta really sucks. The textures seriously arent better than killzone3 multiplayer and the gameplay's the goddamn same as crysis 2 it just feels like a map pack for crysis 2 oh yea the maps pretty much suck too.
I dont see how my 560ti, which is probably close to being twice as powerful as the GPU in the 360 is barely able to out perform 360 games. The biggest thing i get is AA and resolutions but overall games dont look much better on the PC, even with the extra hardware i got.
Maybe its just the games i own but as of right now i own Dead Space, Mass Effect and Gears of War on PC and 360. Yet my PC version isn't all that much better looking?
Is it that developers only move graphics up the scale when a new console cycle comes around or what? I dont understand the PC love when developers aren't giving me much of it.
Kokuro_Kun
You are playing console ports the only real difference is textures
Log in to comment