I'm not sure which I would choose, as both are very good in my opinion. I would aim towards Halo 3 for single player, although the AI and environmentsin Call of Duty 4are amazing. Both multiplayers are fun, but in COD 4's multiplayer there's more to do: unlock weapons and attachments, gain ranks, complete challenges, etc, as opposed to just ranks in Halo 3.

Just giving you my opinion. I'm afraid I wouldn't be able to decide between the two.

Oh god, here comes this again. *sigh*

The Xbox has plenty of other good titles that aren't shooters.

Online is usually always better.

They probably make the Campaigns short on purpose, because they know people are going to be playing online most of the time.

I'm getting kind of tired of hearing people complaining about the single player on basically every game.

I agree. I would be mad myself.

Nintendo used to do that. Look at the Game Boy Advance, there's three different versions of it. The normal one, the SP, and the Micro. Completely useless; each of them probably has one advantage over another.

It seems to me Nintendo has gotten better at that though, so nevermind.

There were rumors of a new PSP with a hard drive inside of it. That would be very awesome, and another analog stick would be cool as well. I think they should just spend their time on the next PSP though and really make it worthwhile. To be honest, the game library sucks on this PSP, they're all ports. They need to improve on that.

They did say they were planning on making it smaller and lighter in the future, you know.

But you can't really complain with the current design, it's so awesome looking.