I'm sorry, but I couldn't help it.
So I've been 17 for a month now, and of course I bought my first rated M game. If you must know it was No More Heroes, and it's awesome, but that is not what I'm here to talk about. I'm here to talk about the insignificance of game ratings. So I'll start by taking you back to my first video game ever.
It was Christmas, I was 8 and my brother was 6. We both wanted an N64, and what do you know? Santa (My Aunt)brought us one. Not only that but he got us a game called Glover (Rated E) and Get Force Gemini (Rated T) So back then I was young, my brother was even younger, and we grew up blowing heads off of drones in incredible graphics for the time. Did it leave an impression that I should go around killing people? Nope, but was it fun? Yes. My parents may have found it a little strange that we enjoyed the game so much seeing as it was for teens, and we weren't even 10 yet, but we didn't understand plot or anything, we just liked going around shooting what looked like ants, which is what I'm sure a lot of little kids felt that played that game.
Fast forward a few years, I'm about 12 and my brother's 10. Again it's Christmas, and we ask for an Xbox and Halo which,as all of you know, is rated M. Again Santa brought it to us (in fact he got us Halo 1 and 2) and we loved it. Being older we understood the plot more, we understood the concept of killing and all that, but it was a video game, and it was fun. Did we go around doing crazy things? Nope, we just played our first rated M game, and had fun.
Now, fast forward another few years, I'm 16, my brother's 14. I want to buy a rated M game for his birthday. I get my mom to go to the store and buy P3FES (Don't know how much you know about the game, but its an RPG, and to summon stuff the characters shoot themselves in the head.) So we still have that game, and it's really got a deep story, awesome characters, a ton of swearing and suggestive themes, basically everything that would make a rated M game mature. But it's a game, fun at that, and a cool experience.
One more year ahead. I'm 17, and just a few days after I turn it, I go out to buy No More Heroes. My little cuz knows I'm 17 so he asks if he could tag along. So I buy my game, and I buy (with his money) Modern Warfare (Rated M.) My cousin is 13, but his mom let him, so I wasn't about to argue anything.
So where am I going with this? Well, what's the point of ratings if my entire life I've been surrounded with games way too "Mature" for me. Who is ESRB trying to protect? Now, I'm not saying don't warn about content, but ratings have become just so over analyzed, it's just a waste of time. There should be warnings like "May be inappriote for..." but stores shouldn't have to card or anything, just give the kid the game. It should be up to the parent to chose what games are best for kids, not ESRB.
Now, I'll quickly mention a few things, first off, where did the rating KA come from? In the 90's it was on a lot of games, mostly sports games. It meant Kids-Adults, but there was also an E rating on games as well. Does E mean little kids, well no, since there's EC. What's the point of EC anyway, I think it should be obvious if a game is for Early Childhood. Why make a rating for that? A few more points. What's up with the rating E10+? It's absolutely the most pointless rating ever imagined. If you must rate it, either rate it E, or rate it T. Most kids can handle T games. That's not to say there aren't scary games out there that are rated T or M, but why not just say "Frightening for children" on the box or something where game ratings are? Instead "Violence" is shown on the back of boxes. Now, on to my last point, what is up with the AO rating? It's just as pointless as the E10+ rating. I mean, whats one year have to do with anything? Why 18, and why aren't M games 18, who decided 17? Now I'm sure it's for pornographic reasons, but wasn't Max Payne pushed up to AO, or is that just my imagination? Anyway, the only reason a game should be carded is if it's for something pornographic. One last true point. In arcades there are little signs on games that say "Lifelike Violence" or "Approite for everyone" and stuff like that. Why not just do that for video games instead of actually ratings?
Now, I'm not really saying get rid of ratings, I'm saying people shouldn't interpret them as law. Why MUST you be 17 to buy M rated games? Most people will get their hands on multiple M rated games before they're 17, so what's the big deal? E10 should have never been created, just bump it up to T if you have to put something like E10 on the case. There should be guidelines, but it should always be up to the parents to choose what their child plays, and in my opinion, if a parent can't trust a 13 year old child with an M rated game, there is something up with that child.
Log in to comment