You can still buy a Wii U regardless of its discontinuation, you can still play the game on a console that is not the Nintendo Switch.

It's not an exclusive game, it's on two completely separate platforms.

Oh, people are doing the 'brand exclusive' thing again...

It's not a Switch exclusive, it's not a Wii U exclusive, it's on two completely different platforms, and what is that called boys and girls? A multi-platform game.

See that's the thing, you're using that to scapegoat the discussion as you know I cannot demonstratively prove that in any one direction, and neither can you against it, I know it, you know it, everyone who reads this will know it. It's an easy and safe way to get out of an argument and feel as if you're somehow right and the other person is wrong, but that's not really what it entails and like the aforementioned; we all know that.

What I'm saying could absolutely still be correct regardless of your escape method, and empirically it completely adds up as up until Nintendo forced the community to the bottom end of the hardware spectrum everyone cared, I have that at least, you have nothing more than people claiming to not care. Everyone cared in the Nintendo community just as people in the Xbox and PlayStation community still do now, and that's because they're still competitive in that regard, Nintendo is not, and it's sure not because the community asked for it.

What exclusive game? Breath of the Wild? That's not an exclusive game however much it may be touted as one. Also this is a Nintendo console, they don't exactly have third party on their side so almost the entirety of their sales will be for their first party games. Nintendo makes amazing games, and they pump out a lot of them, enough to justify a system on the back of the games alone, Microsoft and Sony don't subscribe to this way of conducting business and primarily survive on third party.

Subtract 55% from that number and you're on track.

Just because something is "good enough" doesn't mean there is not a want or desire for more, people settle for things all the time. Women, the houses they can afford, the cars they drive etc, we have to settle for less than we want all the time and instead of taking that objectively you're taking it negatively and being defensive, it's so predictably Nintendo fanaticism.

The Nintendo community always cared about these things until Nintendo forced their hand and no longer made it a point of argument for the community. It's not as if the community suddenly stopped caring because of free will, it's because they had no choice in the matter and instead of being honest with not only themselves, they outwardly project to the gaming community at large that it doesn't as they're always in last place in this regard.

It's easy to say you don't care when you're at the bottom, you don't have a choice and you need to make yourself feel better about it, that's called brushing it off. It's hard for people to actually be honest with themselves and those around them and just say that they're okay, but they wish Nintendo would have created a more powerful console.

The space time continuum is not going to collapse by being honest.

I'll give him that, it's a great game with A LOT of really engaging gameplay, but the story is very, very short and simple when you really break down how much of it there actually is.

If you could go into this game with full stamina and heart containers you could honestly beat the main quests of the game including the 'dugeons' in 5-6 hours. There's not a lot of meat on the bones of this games story, there's just so much in between that it presents itself as more than it actually is.

Wow, at a locked 60 FPS and 4K this is brilliant!

You have no idea what it's going to cost from square one, the thing could be $400 for all we know.

You're going off the edge with ideas and logic that have no basis in presently known reality.

It was a big deal when the SNES was around, and when the Nintendo 64 was around, maybe not resolution because that wasn't a massive point of argument at the time but the graphical fidelity sure was. Oh and don't forget the GameCube, that was a big point of bragging for the Nintendo community, the system was in near parity with the Xbox and everyone knew about it because the Nintendo community made it known, especially when it came to games like Star Wars: Rouge Leader.

Just because Nintendo became complacent and changed their focus to gimmicky hardware emphasis with the Wii, Wii U and now Switch doesn't mean these people no longer care, they absolutely do care, especially in the face of things like CEMU showing off what these games could look like had Nintendo remained focused on processing power.

They simply state that they do not care because they've been forced into another direction where they have no choice but to take what they get. Outwardly the Nintendo community will say exactly as you are now, that "it's not a big deal" or whatever drivel can be derived from this line of discussion, but we all know if they could have it better they would.

There's no rationalization that can objectively quantify being okay with much less when it could clearly be substantially more.