chrisiscool69's forum posts

  • 25 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for chrisiscool69
chrisiscool69

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 chrisiscool69
Member since 2005 • 37 Posts

yea most of the nba2k gamers all started out playin live cause live was the nba game to have on the old consols. but ye just i find everything in 2k is better then live has and what they have to offer. live's new big thing is player dna, wich sounds pretty cool, but i dont think live will use it to its full potential, and that it will have no effect on the game. also people dont like how 2k menu is set up, i find nothing wrong with it, it might look allitle old fashion maby? but i have no problem with it and i like it. so i am really looking forward to 2k9 shall be a sik game, any one of u wanna challenge me some time just let me know

xbox360 gamertag - zeneth fire

Avatar image for chrisiscool69
chrisiscool69

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 chrisiscool69
Member since 2005 • 37 Posts

Hey peeps, this has always been a big question and battle. I wanna hear all your thoughts towards this on going fued between the 2 developers. I started out as nba live guy, on the ps2, then to the 360 with nbalive06 and 07, then i got my hands on nba2k7 and thats when it all changed. this is my opinion, i think that 2k takes the lead in this on going battle. the gameplay in that game is way more advanced and soo much smoother than the live series. the game is so much more realistic and sounds better. now it may not have the same superb visuals as nba live does, but when it comes to wich game you want to buy, u would rather go for 2k, who cares if the visuals arn't spectacular, the graphics are all right, but the game play in nba live is brutal and it has always beeen the same since it was first realeasd way back then. so share yout opinions

Avatar image for chrisiscool69
chrisiscool69

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 chrisiscool69
Member since 2005 • 37 Posts

With no doubt in my mind, HALO is the xbox's flagship holder. It created first person shooter in its own way. Halo had amazing graphics for its time and the campiang was awsome, people loved halo i think it was the greatest 1st person shooter ever created. it showed us how fun it was beating an alien to the side of the head. and picking off the grunts with your pistool one by one, and runnong over jackals with your jeep. But the main thing it showed us was multiplayer and co-op. co-op was really populare back in the nintendo 64 era with perfect dark and many others but then it shaded aways, but once halo was relased it became very popular again. new games were made with the co-op fetaure and mutiplayerit was big. and then halo2 came out and it just exploded. now online was rebourn. millions of people still play halo2 onlin by this day. now gears in my own oppinion doesn't have a good multiplayer that sticks to you. there is a limited amount of maps to choose from which are small in size and the varity of weapones are also small. you use the same gun over and over the shotgun...... now i am not saying that gears is a bad game, its an amazing game with spectacular graphics but that is the thing that beats halo right now its graphics well halo was made a longtime before gears was made and gears is on the 360 but once halo3 comes out people will forget about gears of war right away.

  • 25 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3