Why the hell did THQ decide to come out with an expansion for STALKER? They still haven't fixed the bugs with the first game. Sure the game is a great concept, and has a new style of gameplay, I like it but why the hell aren't they spending their time fixing bugs...the +1,000,000 of them! DUMB...

2005wrxsti

cause expansions bring more $$$ than patches - thats what we learned from ea

[QUOTE="DarkRecruit"]I love how people complain about "+1 000 000" bugs but never mention even 1 of them. I have never seen a bug in STALKER. zipozal

It's not really a bug, but the game has abysmal performance on ATI cards and great performance on Nvidia ones, thats piss poor programming when you neglect to optimize your game for ATI which has roughly 40% of gamers user base.

i dont think its an engine problem ati has overall poor hdr performance, i turned hdr off and it runs smooth on my x1900xt

Wow you guys claim to have hte first PC's and i had an older one when i was just a kid and im only 20. Had DOS then windows 3.1 first computer game i played was a qbasic game where it was 2 gorillas throwing a banana.

Zippo_Fire

lol same for, i played that game on a 386dx 40mhz with dos 5.0 and windows 3.1

Resident Evil - Zombies are the best

Painkiller - has the best bosses

[QUOTE="crapdog"]yeah but it feels like cheating to meadamfazai

Its sound like a cheat, but as we know the philosophy of CHEATS is that they should be designed for those who play a lot and addicted to a game. So they should be like something that when player uses them after some time he will end with the game and hate the game. These kind of codes in Titan Quest gives you not very Cool Items. They will be useless after sometimes when you have found more valuable items.

cheats are NOT for players who play alot but for the developers to test game mechanics without playing the game regulary