example, a intel quadcore with a 8600 GTS wouldnt run game's nearly as good as a athlon 64 x2 with a 8800 GTX. video card is important when pc gaming and it's more important with console gaming also works the same. and to claim ps3 is more powerful is false.
look at the spec's were people xbox360's gpu owns rsx without a doubt unified memory is better than split system memory. ps3's only advantage is cell/cpu . im sorry more system memory and more powerful gpu is more important than a fast cpu, it works the same on pc and console.
I honestly can't help but shake this feeling that if Killzone 2 was made for the 360 from the ground up and optimized for it...it would come out looking better than the ps3 version:?
Sad but true.
I also find it funny that as much as people rave on about how powerful the ps3 is supposed to be compared to the 360, cows always have a way of saying they don't notice small graphical difference when they play. Example, the RE5 thread showing the 360 killing the ps3. Cows say..oh it's just a little thing , why would I go buy a 360 just for a small thing. My question is why would someone want to buy a ps3 for the same small differences especially when you'll be paying more money:|
demon-returns
it's true. xbox360 is overall more powerful than ps3. metal gear solid 4 would look better on xbox360 even if it came on 10 disk.
Log in to comment