What? Looking at these screenshots, yeah, there isn't much difference at all... but when I play the games, I can tell you Gears of War 2 looks way better, especially in action. Either way, this is a terribly written feature with even worse analysis. I'll point out one key flaw: Marcus and Dom definitely DO look different. Marcus' scar is much more apparent and then Dom's hair has been improved, so I'm wondering what they're looking at here. But the biggest and most apparent changes are in the NEW environments in Gears of War 2. That first Locust cave you go into is a brilliant example, with all the strange plants. Look, don't formulate any opinion based on this article. It's written badly and analyzed worse. Add to that, the screenshots don't do either real justice.

Now the cheap Japanese people are gonna start buying 360s. If there are cheap Americans, there must be cheap Japanese people too. And I know A LOT of cheap Americans.

It's still too cheap for me to consider buying it... They'll need to be at least 11 trillion yen, then I'll buy Nintendo.

CoD4 looks the best and it's for both! That's really the only one I care much about... Brother's in Arms and Airborne don't interest because I'm really sick of WWII shooters. I'm not saying this to troll, but is it me, or does SOCOM have the worst visuals of the above (besides Airborne)?

Looks just like HALO 2, and I really can't see many differences... But if the beta looks like HALO 2... then the real version should alot better!