Evolution of websurfing for knowledge into profit and game

I decided to review the two best drivers and which one is best for certain people. Since firefox changes into a web browser easily with a google chrome-like interface, it is perfered for gamers or pc gamers whom have a pc hooked up to their hd, however firefox is only better because of one thing, its fast. It loads fast, and it quits fast. Google chrome is good for certain things like playing music while playing games etc, but it doesn't load fast. Its wildly compatible with almost every website out, and ideal for favoriting websites, however, if you want to change settings like IP configs for developers fire fox is still better. I did notice one thing google chrome has that firefox doesn't though, and that's a sleeker appearance to print out things faster. For someone buying, selling and shopping I would prefer IE or Google chrome. Google chrome also has a lined interface when web developing on html websites, except it doesn't save. No updates are required, and best of all GOogle chrome doesn't crash..ever. Its simple and easy. If I wanted to do things quickly like research or check facebook, go with firefox however if I wanted to watch movies and save information like shopping through favorites I would go with Google chrome. Both are good for games, one has the xp blue design the other the green interface to make it look nice. Except for one thing, GOogle Chrome plays videos more easily without crashing for systems with lots of ram, therefore why put in a music cd, when you can just play a play list on youtube? For other web browsers like Internet explorerer, limits your configs but chrome jus simplifies them easily. Everyone knows u can't delete cookies in IE. That's a major design flaw. Opera looks interesting for gamers being affiliated directly with wii but is risky in a spyware app type of way. Chrome also saves passwords more effectively and is free from spyware. For research firefox can delete everything and enter safe mode on slow computers. Firefox lets u choose the apps and + it has more except it doesn't have things like built in flash or DNS (for saving search results, passwords etc). Firefox has more compatibility options for foreign third party programs and eats up less ram though (for slower computers). If you like apps I would go for both either or, apps are simple web browsers. For developers check your stats, edit wiki entires, use mozilla but for gamers Go fast, go chrome.

Perference over Quality..it takes two to tango

firefox achilles heel, delete profile and all the hackers working for that dead end job dont go into your pc. BTW imho, firefox belongs to the civil war era of computers along with ubuntu and other newly invented confederate technology at that time. Google chrome may load slow, but its not a college kids playground like firefox is...mozilla turned bad aka the bad lamb. No more library browsing safely, but a site preference nightmare. Firefox is so unstable, it reboots itself whenever u get these so-called spyware 'updates' or when the registry magically becomes defunct after a lightning storm or power outage. Btw, to these insiders, staying on earth much for money poop is better than doing it for selfish purposes. I would hate for my frozen soul to be floating around 'up there', for infinite time. Does a cow moo or bark? Why doesn't the grasshopper cherp when youre near it? Sometimes the cow does indeed bark. Leave me on earth, you though, can go to hell. The fact is some competitors on the market don't have enemies...ebay has ebid..well technically market wise it has amazon.com, mozilla has opera (both 'gaming' browsers with spyware), yet xbox 360 has ps3, windows has mac and chrome has communism jk it prob has the most hated browser out-there, 'ie'. Google chrome is safer imho and more stable. Its a gaming browser, research one etc. Except i use mozilla 2.0 or something for a backup browser. Firefox used to be good basically so my verdict is google chrome wins. One needs a competitor to stay healthy, but in terms of communism, ebay and google, it seems the competition is dead in the water. Unfortunetly, firefox is one of those on that 'loner' list.;):arrow:

..is there even a position for #1? Guess not...but here goes (2014 update)

Imho, the position for number 1 is not google chrome or firefox. Firefox has utilities and saving features for html editors yet it crashes and at times can have downloading problems, in particular viruses via digital signatures, Google chrome has background updates they don't tell you about and often then most resets your settings without telling you. Best of all it doesn't have a delete history when close feature, meaning junk stays on your computer, although it is the most stable, often then most running on problematic pcs perfectly. It is funny, because I choose Internet Explorer actaully, the plague when set right will give you a flawless pc and a perfect design. Its simple, active x blockage is a necessity since windows xp created an operating system. With blocking digital signatures you will never need underground programs, paid for virus scanners or reinstalling/reformatting o/s. Only I.E. has this, and is a reason why it was chosen for xbox 360. Because without registry manipulation, browsers work prefectly, and consoles have no registry. With active x controls set right, browsers work perfectly and chrome/firefox has none of this. The only downside is that you won't be able to use websites, or they won't appear correctly, yet this is their fault for being greedy or negating the true problems. Not everyone wants to be a computer expert in spyware from third party sites. Blocking digital signatures is like blocking system information. Its vital for viruses to not go in your pc, and xp (the whole of the internet, xp, 7, vista you name it) will be built around explorer for years to come. Internet Explorer is in truth the best there is to give.

Firefox down again?!!

PS: next time you decide to sync email addys or update web browsers before thunder storms, would rec not becus it jus shows your dead in job on two fields. They tend to update web-browsers and sync emails. Except firefox freezes and creates too many problems and google chrome isn't even that great because they do the same thing. Automatic updates become problematic because they reset the custom data that was set. That and quick boots...via simple thunderstorms. So the article above was basically me losing information during a thunder-storm, firefox is good for library computers, its just not stable. I have problems with site preferences etc. but this is spyware tampering related. Better check that, firefox has the best updates on the net, and these 'college' kids are what makes the internet great, a well oiled machine that rarely breaks. Its just one of those things I rec but isn't perfect. Firefox is not number one but it has no competitors. Would rec firefox actually for a browser that is faster than ie and google chrome...the problem is not firefox, its xp in general, come to think of it its the browser i use the most ironically. Chrome once again is the better suit and tie, then firefox which is light weight and fast, yet constantly crashes. Chrome is rec for fast computers, firefox for slower outdated ones. The only small problem we see is chrome saves information on your pc and firefox does not. As far as I know, I experience technical difficulties (uhhh..its not the rain!?!) on my service with firefox...it basically has a problem. It obtains fraudulent signatures fairly easily. Why do I rec google chrome over firefox times 10? Because of this major reason: Google chrome is not virus penetrable source: there have been news stories on the internet that microsoft gave google corporation viruses, they wanted to obtain their license ie a pyramid scheme, capitalism is built on greed. Firefox however is a huge base for fraudulent signatures. Ever have a mozilla add-on? Well that's because of firefox's fraudulent signatures from you visiting popular websites. Ever hav your homepage go into 404s or be changed somehow? Well, luckily I found out it was infact the microsoft o/s tracking you. Proof is I navigated to the signatures on google chrome (under windows 7, waahh..its not even under the msc tool or watever under windows?!? Microsoft....you sh1t on the floor again). Anyways, there in windows 7 I found it again. Google chrome has a tool to verify untrusted root signatures, as to why they upload/dl sh1t from 1993 onwards may even be this reason...once again..open explorer was built before the operating system. Specifically for spying and sabotage. Microsoft has computers every 3 of 4 years being built faster this way, by destroying it collectively via thousands upon thousands of users. Google chrome also has been able to override this major error by making 2 or 3 bots instead of one run in the background. Root signatures need one bot for verification, and most app based web browsers have just that. However, Google chrome has 2 or 3, and the root signatures are only verified through them in general eg a fraudulent root signature is rechecked on the server up to 5 times and never gets through or added for that matter. You won't be getting an add on in the appfolder through html5 either, you may through flash though. google chrome is not app based either basically. No google folders under app document and settings dls for that tool bar that keeps popping up again (adblock, i'm looking at you). Unfortunately this is like having 5 virus scans on a slow pc, however Google chrome is by far the most safe web browser outthere. Internet explorer takes the cake, for web surfing and working ie online selling. Firefox for working with code. However, IE has features such as the save picture feature while googling, and firefox does not. Either that or use console web browsers...console browsers are getting better and more safe, one reason is the hardware or operating system is built first with the only issue being the service itself.