dcyple's forum posts
k certain titles that been released lately just don't focus on whats really important!SINGLE PLAYER CAMPAIGN.i MEAN GUYS i BEAT COD4 in 5 hours!!!!!!!!! FIVE HOURS!!!!.and i got store cred for it the next day,I mean why even bother making a game with a campaign that short.whats the point?whats the point in making a game with 6 stages,(ARMY OF TWO)WHICH i WILL BE TRADING IN FOR dark sector tomorrow.But my point is games of today, this generation focus two topics a bit too much,eye candy(graphics)&multiplayer(onlinemultiplayer)now nothing is wrong with a good multiplayer BUT in each title that has it its almost the same, a king of the hill,a capture the flag(not always those words)& a death match.in each game its the same thing just a different concept of it.Now eye candy,I love a game that's good on the eyes but after a while the graphics will wear thin.I just think they should take the extra time,push a game back for another year.work on something that will make someone say o.k!!!I'll spend $64 on this.because lately it's been pretty DISAPPOINTING.search your hearts guyz&galz you know I'm right.
Its just a couple writers speculation about why EA was trying to buy up all these developers. Its an interesting theory, but really, this is the first time that all 3 major consoles have a strong following. EA would be making a mistake to try and enter the race now. Anybody would. DZBricktop
Log in to comment