(Checks the calendar and verifies that it's not 4/1.)

Woohoo!!! Love it. I am so buying this on day one!

@bbq_R0ADK1LL: That's how I see it. Even for well-reviewed games, I almost never pay full price unless there's a significant amount of content for the price or it's something I know that I will play more than once. Otherwise, I'm content to wait for a sale or rent on Gamefly.

Will check this out once it is on sale. I can't justify spending $20 on a game this short.

Too bad they don't fix the real problem with Halo 5: the lack of local co-op. The loss of that mode was a dealbreaker for me and others who enjoy playing games with their spouse or when friends come over to visit. I don't need 60 fps for local co-op. It would be nice, but I'll take 30 fps for local co-op gameplay.

@AyatollaofRnR: Yeah as long as they don't scale back to four players in the other multiplayer modes I'm fine with a two player local/online co-op story mode. The loss of couch co-op and the ability for two players to play split screen online has turned my Xbox and PS4 into paper weights since there's hardly any AAA games that support these features. It's why my online crew has skipped buying Halo 5 and why I've barely touched the game.

@nights_team2k7 While I want 60 fps in multiplayer, I'm fine with 30 fps in a single player campaign (as long as it's a consistent 30 fps) if it means more games including local coop. My wife and I love to play games together and the new systems have been a huge disappointment as to how many games have dropped local coop to support 60 fps (Halo 5 immediately springs to mind).

@jinzo9988: Agreed. If Valve is trying to appeal to console owners (the only people who would want this type of machine), then the PC needs to not only be capable of playing Steam games at a decent framerate with graphics that compare favorably to an Xbox One/PS4, but also include the ability to play blu-rays/watch TV/run apps like Amazon and Netflix... all at the $350 - $400 price point. I don't see how Valve does that without taking a loss on hardware costs and so instead we're stuck with a PC that doesn't make any sense to PC or console users.

@ps4_and_x1: Yeah, in addition to my Xbox One I also have a PS4 and the original "fat" PS3 that plays PS1 & PS2 games and I can't see myself ever wasting money on Sony's streaming service. On a side note, I'd be curious to hear how their streaming service is actually doing since I can't imagine it being very popular in its current format.

Unless my math is fuzzy, the number of titles in that linked list Gamespot posted is far less than 100.