@19James89

I couldn't agree more and this I have not spent money on any cod games since cod 2

@LS-Chaos

Well, if it's 2 man squads that hardly seems worth it. That wouldn't be a squad at all. there isn't enough players in cod to warrant squads.

So wait a minute, they are adding squads to a litttle 8 vs 8 battles. so what two 4 man squads per team. Cod is so wimpy.

Of course Battlefield series resonates particularly well with the PC gamers! that's where battlefield was born and that's really what pushes the bf games to the max, that's also another great point as to why BF makes Cod look like crap in comparison.

@Fitcherman @djpetitte

they already know idiot!!! oh my god, go fucking get a clue, you are by far the dumbest person on here. SO next gen they are using an engine that was outdated in 2005?

@Fitcherman

Youre in denial, and just really dumb, its a laugh. keep em coming, Ill school you every comment.

@Fitcherman @djpetitte

No that's just poor lazy programming and there's no doubt here that you are the newb lol its very funny. I think people are agreeing with me here. SO yea lets use the same engine forever. hahahhahahahahahahhaha moron,

@Fitcherman

You should probably just be quite now because you're looking like a real dumb ass.

@Fitcherman @djpetitte by your comments I can tell you aren't a very savvy gamer in the least. therefore youre probably just a little guy. So youre suggesting they continue to use the same engine? HAH that's a laugh. hey go research the engine cod has been using for the past 7 years. from a tech standpoint there are a lot of way better engines out there that run at well over 60 fps, newb