eldigi's forum posts

Avatar image for eldigi
eldigi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 eldigi
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="eldigi"]

[QUOTE="mD-"]

stop generalizing people/fanboys. #1 problem with people on these boards.

Alpha-Male22

You literally contradicted yourself there, makes you a hypocrite.

How so? He didn't say every person on these boards have the problem.

His second sentence is a generalization of people on these boards.

Avatar image for eldigi
eldigi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 eldigi
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

stop generalizing people/fanboys. #1 problem with people on these boards.

mD-

You literally contradicted yourself there, makes you a hypocrite.

Avatar image for eldigi
eldigi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 eldigi
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="eldigi"]

[QUOTE="gaboi09"]

...Well not to me but to alot of so-called tech heads it might. Pay attention to 1.20 - 1.27, it's the closest direct comparison I have found in the video and it's a land scape with a long draw distancethat showshowboth systems are going to output graphically on this engine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKLIkGPxMkU&feature=related

things I always recognizd were better for each system:

PS3 = better: lighting, physics, particle effects, shaders, objects on screen (example = Resistance 2, warhawk, Killzone 2...basically almost every PS3 exclusive)

xbox360 = better: textures and Anti-analyzing (examples = Mass Effect, Gears of War, Resident Evil 5)

It is for these strengths that I believe the PS3 is doing better than the 360 here. What's suprizing tho is that this is a PC game, and even tho PS3 was built ot excell in these areas, with xbox360 being so easy to cross develop between the PC...it still isn't able to out proform the Ps3 is in this the most demanding PC game/engine to date.

Opinins/question/critisisms?

gaboi09

Im sorry but this is the stupidest analysis you could have made. You say the PS3 has better lighting and shaders when simply the PS3 was just render brighter. Then saying the physics and objects on screen was better when there is no proof of that in this video because there was no distinguishing difference. Then you say the xbox has better textures and anti analyzing is just stupid sorry but unless you have a digital magnifying glass I dont see how you made this assumption, let me remind you that this is a youtube quality video. How about we just all wait and see what game they decided to make using this engine is released and then get out our magnifying glasses.

Did you by any chance see the games I listed for each system as examples of their strengths that show their proff for what I was saying in real terms? No...no I guess you didn't. And I won't bother responding to anymore of you posts either.

Is there any xbox fan orgamer in generalwho has comments or objects to the observations I made in this withoutposting like anidiot or a mindless fanboy in the processor a mindless? If not then I won't bother replying to anyone else in here.

Im sorry I made you mad or atleast I think I did, I had a hard time understanding your mindless crying. I read every single post before this, watched the engine video repeatively, wikipedia the terms you used, and rented the games you mentioned for both systems so that I could make the best possible understanding of what you were trying to get across. Next time dont be so defensive and idiotic and please realize that no one cares.

Avatar image for eldigi
eldigi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 eldigi
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

...Well not to me but to alot of so-called tech heads it might. Pay attention to 1.20 - 1.27, it's the closest direct comparison I have found in the video and it's a land scape with a long draw distancethat showshowboth systems are going to output graphically on this engine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKLIkGPxMkU&feature=related

things I always recognizd were better for each system:

PS3 = better: lighting, physics, particle effects, shaders, objects on screen (example = Resistance 2, warhawk, Killzone 2...basically almost every PS3 exclusive)

xbox360 = better: textures and Anti-analyzing (examples = Mass Effect, Gears of War, Resident Evil 5)

It is for these strengths that I believe the PS3 is doing better than the 360 here. What's suprizing tho is that this is a PC game, and even tho PS3 was built ot excell in these areas, with xbox360 being so easy to cross develop between the PC...it still isn't able to out proform the Ps3 is in this the most demanding PC game/engine to date.

Opinins/question/critisisms?

gaboi09

Im sorry but this is the stupidest analysis you could have made. You say the PS3 has better lighting and shaders when simply the PS3 was just render brighter. Then saying the physics and objects on screen was better when there is no proof of that in this video because there was no distinguishing difference. Then you say the xbox has better textures and anti analyzing is just stupid sorry but unless you have a digital magnifying glass I dont see how you made this assumption, let me remind you that this is a youtube quality video. How about we just all wait and see what game they decided to make using this engine is released and then get out our magnifying glasses.

Avatar image for eldigi
eldigi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 eldigi
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

next to big lebowski and other coen brothers movies...

Avatar image for eldigi
eldigi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 eldigi
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
They could launch at $600 with an unnecessary disc format and be inferior technically, have crappy first party games for about the first year or so, ruin their wonderful controller, and completely screw up there online service... oh wait this sounds familiar. Lolz First Post lolz