@WheelerJared @jamesdvhunt well yes is more convenient to have a console, i pc need more attention updates etc, i em a pc player but if PS3 or Xbox will come in a day with a mouse and keyboard yep i gonne buy it...
@CommodoreRaslin Technical reported to the game world a weapon of that type of accelerator mass effect may have hundreds, given that the bullets can be very tiny...you could have a handgun with 90 projectiles, or an assault rifle with 300projectiles.
But in a such weapon most important is the electrical source...power source should be rechargeable or battery changed...
I like the infinit ammo from ME1 but also to need ammo or a power source ad more tactic decisions...[ex. in Ghost Recon1 or ArmA, you not want to waste the ammo]
@Kabals i agreed with you, it was not perfect but it have more rpg things and the story was nice, and if you play on last difficulty level, well...is good
@TroyTrojanGamer the most stupid thing was to not take good things from Mass effect 1 and make another game with the same flavor like in 1... i still play 1 and not 2 or 3
well the new war games are made for new generation players...this is why i dont mind graphics and i still play Ghost Recon 1 and i not playing Ghost Recon Future Soldier...most of new games are all graphics and holywood tears...same with cod or new moh series
engraphos' comments