Can't really blame him. Game looks ridiculous.

Simply, good games have a higher score than shitty games.

Surprise, surprise!

He's on it: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=133639814#post133639814

Aaaaand it's ready: http://blog.metaclassofnil.com/?p=618

From the page:

Its current features are:

• Arbitrary rendering and presentation resolutions (only 16:9 though)
• HUD hiding (using the normal GeDoSaTo keybindings)

It’s bugs and known issues are:

• Some off-by-a-bit scaling issues, making the output less sharp than it should be in some circumstances

• DoF effects are unchanged (still at original, low resolution – this is more apparent in contrast to higher resolutions)

• Probably some stuff somewhere is cut off. I saw some scissor calls and am not dealing with them yet

• Crashes when taking screenshots using GeDoSaTo

• Rendering resolutions larger than 3840×2160 don’t work

• Probably lots more

The shit AA and shit AF detracts from its great visuals.

So, this guy from GAF says he's seen the game and that it plays fine at 60FPS. Ignore the 'soap opera' bullshit.

Shit Tech 5.

I honestly can't tell if people are being serious or not when they say they can't see the difference. Hell, I even had my hand on the left side of the screen and even then I could tell whether it was 30FPS or 60FPS.

"Konami has revealed that our edition of the experimental Metal Gear Solid 5 prologue will bring 4K resolution support, an increased number of simultaneous light shadows, more simultaneous models and an increased shadow resolution."

Those are some nice additions, not sure why they fucked up with PES this year.

LOL, they can't be this stupid.