NEW GRAPHICS AND GAMEPLAY OF NEW GAMES AND OLD GAMES (the old days)
by firo999 on Comments
I have played videogames since i was 4 years old and i m still playing them now but...well...thewy aren't what they used to be i mean now u have to buy a 1200 $ rig just to keep up with the new games, game companies will start losing profit if they keep on making them. all the games today are flash but no content i got medal of honor airborne the day it came out and found to be a great game however it had the missing storyline of the other medal of honor's now it's only 5 or 7 operations everyone of them u can finish in 2 to 5 hours on expert i finished it in 3 days while medal of honor pacific assault although not so cracked up on graphics took me much more time and it was much more amusing cause it had a story line a good one infact.Games are losing more content and winning more graphics. one question i ask all old time gamers who now play these new games :what made super mario so good. next thing we are gonna notice is a super mario on next gen graphics which need 2 gigs ram and 512 vga and a dual core and 10 gb free space. i miss the days where we get new games on our computer and ps1 and play them for 10 hours everyday trying to solve the mysteries. I tell u this the games that are worth playing these days are only numbered and are splinter cell, prince of persia, boiling point, farcry, medalof honor pacific assault and backward versions, oblivion,adn most importantly resident evil. NOW with all of the games coming out i find that the upcoming farcry 2 , assassin's creed ,adn splinter cell conviction which are all ubisoft games.Well i am not taking a side of game company but this seems to be true considering that these are the only games actually having a story.I hope game companies change their minds someday and do something about it and i know i am goint to get alot of bad replies if i get any which critisize my opinion but i say they don't know what games mean