i run crysis on my pc which has a radeon x1550 512 mb on medium and i put some settings on high you just have to know the right twist anyway i'm getting a 8800 gtx i can get one of those but i don't know why i feel that 8800 is stronger they should have put it in the comparison too

i don't know why everybody is sad about not being able to run the game on high it's the game that draws the player not the graphics super mario didn't use dx 10 and pixel shader 4 and 640 mb vram and still was played by millions maybe more when it came out i used to play most of the new games on low on my old computer although the graphics weren't life like like everybody likes but i still played it i only bought a new computer when the games started not working

i don't know why people use these extreme resolutions 2048* something they said at nvidia about 8800 i still run every game on 1024 * 768 resolution [monitor won't let me :( ] clear pictures

IF ONLY I CAN RUN XP SIGH vista ultimate works like a charm but in xp while installing devices a blue screen comes up getting xp to work on my rig will greatly improve performance when we look back a few years ago games would run fast on 500 mhz processors and 64 vga's those where the good old times now every game is 2 dvd's take 10+ gb's more than our old laptops's harddisk! need 2 gb ram and 320mb vram when i say the minimum system requirements of one game can't remember what was it's name it said"256 vram with pixel shader 3.0 and tnl whatever acceleration it made me swear more than 100000 times or more i would just like to say to all graphic producers where do u come up with these things

what everybody needs is good ram and a good vga cpu's don't matter these days my cousin with the same rig as mine plays just cause on high however he has 2.4 celeron or something like that [not centrino] i have 2.66 intel core 2 duo with the same result my friend plays double agent with 1.7 pentium 4 or 3 i don't know [on high] and it actually works fast !